Search for: "United States v. Winslow" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2014, 1:11 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: 01 Complaint An excerpt: This is a suit against the United States for breach of contract and statute by the Indian Health Service (“IHS”), an agency in the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”). [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 11:20 pm
Yesterday the U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 4:15 am
., Inc. v County of Nassau, 2009 NY Slip Op 51819(U), Decided on July 27, 2009, Supreme Court, Nassau County, Judge F. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 7:32 am by Will Baude
In 2008, the Tenth Circuit decided a case called United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:53 am by Ken Kersch
The enumeration of Congress’s powers in Article I, that is, were not limiting (Crosskey, in fact, dedicated Politics and the Constitution “to the Congress of the United States, In the Hope that it May Be Led to Claim and Exercise for the Common Good of the Country the Powers Justly Belonging To It Under the Constitution.”). [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 7:59 am by Raffaela Wakeman
More bad news from Afghanistan: Matthew Rosenberg and Thom Shanker document U.S. concerns that Afghanistan is not yet ready for the United States to withdraw its troops. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 12:38 pm by David Strifling
Winslow became the court’s Chief Justice in 1907. [2] Acton v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 3:43 am by Amy Howe
In Education Week’s School Law Blog, Mark Walsh covers yesterday’s order inviting the United States to weigh in on Ridley School District v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 12:00 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
Winslow Wheeler is hard at work at Time’s Battleland blog discussing the MQ-9 Reaper, a new drone. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
Monday’s argument agenda also included State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 7:11 pm by Vercammen Law
When discovery ended in early January 2020, Care One moved for summary judgment, seeking a determination that plaintiff could not assert a claim based on Care One's breach of any state or federal statutes or regulations. [read post]