Search for: "United States v. Witmer" Results 1 - 11 of 11
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2012, 5:27 am by Benjamin Wittes
Jonathan Witmer-Rich sends in the following commentary on the Amawi case, which I posted yesterday: Just wanted to offer a bit of commentary on U.S. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 5:27 am by Benjamin Wittes
Jonathan Witmer-Rich sends in the following commentary on the Amawi case, which I posted yesterday: Just wanted to offer a bit of commentary on U.S. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 4:08 am by SHG
   And the 6th Circuit’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 10:06 am
Davis, No. 06-666 In the context of states/subdivisions' exemption of interest on their own bonds from their state income taxes, which are imposed on bond interest from other states, the Court rules that Kentucky's version of such a differential tax scheme does not offend the Commerce Clause. [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
Witmer, No. 06-2193 In an action wherein plaintiffs claimed that several state and municipal actors violated their First and Fourth Amendment rights by arresting them during a demonstration against the war in Iraq, summary judgment for police on the issue of qualified immunity is affirmed where, regardless of whether the police violated protesters' First and Fourth Amendment rights, such rights were not "clearly established" in this circumstance. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 8:13 pm by Marty Lederman
Grimm, No. 16-273) dealing with a different civil rights law, Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, which provides that in a school district receiving federal financial assistance, “[n]o person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, . . . be subjected to discrimination. [read post]
27 May 2011, 7:32 am by Dan Markel
Farber (Northeastern University) Privacy in the Workplace: City of Ontario v Quon *Clifford S Fishman (Catholic University of America) Consent-To-Search and Dignity *Josephine Ross (Howard University) Abstract: This country is at a crossroads regarding privacy. [read post]