Search for: "United States v. Wong Kim Ark" Results 21 - 40 of 66
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2021, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  And, not surprisingly, part of the current debate concerns the central issue of Wong Kim Ark, the status of children born to those who are not now—and, possibly, could not never become—citizens of the United States. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 12:55 am by Lawrence Solum
From the 1866 Civil Rights Act through the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 5:48 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Wong Kim Ark, an 1898 case, that a man born on U.S. soil to parents who were Chinese nationals was a citizen. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am by Mary Whisner
Wong Kim Ark, by Erika Lee"The Constitution Follows the Flag . . . but Doesn't Quite Catch up with It": The Story of Downes v. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 12:32 pm by Scott Bomboy
Much of this precedent is based on the Wong Kim Ark decision. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 4:04 pm by John Eastman
  By embracing both Wong Kim Ark and Elk v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 9:30 pm by Greg Robinson
He again stated that “without committing treason” it was his contention that Wong Kim Ark had been “erroneously decided. [read post]
5 Oct 2006, 6:17 pm
 . conclusions" of the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 1:44 pm by sue.altmeyer@law.csuohio.edu
Wong Kim Ark, this article will trace the legal tenets of birthright citizenship as a means to better understand the Citizenship Clause. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 7:48 am by Greg Robinson
Supreme Court case of Wong Kim Ark, which had enshrined the principle of automatic birthright citizenship for all persons born in the United States. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 6:35 pm by Jim Chen
In a forum that has taken pains to praise United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 3:01 am
Wong Kim Ark, the Supreme Court held that the 14th Amendment to the Constitution prohibited denial of citizenship to anyone born in the United States. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 3:01 pm by The JAG HUNTER
Wong Kim Ark (which was citing U.S. v Rhodes, noting that one could only be a British subject or a natural-born citizen, and not hold both citizenships): All persons born in the allegiance of the King are natural-born subjects, and all persons born in the allegiance of the United States are natural-born citizens.” LINK [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 1:30 pm by raoneeri
Wong Kim Ark, which, Professor Oh explains, “held that a Chinese-American child born in the U.S. to immigrant parents was a U.S. citizen. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 3:27 am by Scott Bomboy
They also believe the Wong Kim Ark decision was limited because Wong Kim Ark’s parents were legally in the United States at the time of his birth, and the Elk decision pertained more to birthright citizenship where a child is born to illegal immigrant parents. [read post]