Search for: "United States v. Woodruff" Results 1 - 20 of 44
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2013, 7:43 am by Diane Marie Amann
” Also arguing in favor of vacatur and remand was the United States, which is party to two treaties with similar conditional clauses: Article 11.18 of the 2011 United States-Korea Free Trade Agreement and Article 1121 of the 1992 North American Free Trade Agreement. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 11:14 am by Diane Marie Amann
 In 2007, after an arbitration in the United States, a panel of three arbitrators issued a final award. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 3:28 pm
I think it does become part of the political -- you would then have the Citizens United decision, the Bush v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:19 pm
United States in 1878, where they said there is no constitutional right to polygamy. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 1:06 pm by Diane Marie Amann
As an amicus, the United States argued that such intent might be implicit in the bilateral investment treaty at issue. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 7:15 am by Woodruff Family Law Group
By Joshua Scott Chilton, Legal Assistant & Receptionist, Woodruff Family Law Group On June 26, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States of America made a ruling in a case known as Obergefell v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 3:10 pm by PBS NewsHour
JUDY WOODRUFF: This week saw the Supreme Court make news on same-sex marriage and voting rights and the politicians respond to the first case of Ebola in the United States. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 12:58 pm by Woodruff Family Law Group
Woodruff, North Carolina Family Law Specialist Winston Salem, North Carolina: Malecek v. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 12:58 pm by Woodruff Family Law Group
Woodruff, North Carolina Family Law Specialist Winston Salem, North Carolina: Malecek v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 9:05 am by lpcprof
Two recent decisions, one in a Federal court applying the Federal Daubert standard and one is New York state court applying the Frye general acceptance test, rejected expert testimony based on the results of fMRI scanning.In finding fMRI failed to satisfy the exacting standard of Federal Rule of Evidence 702, a Federal magistrate judge in United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 2:21 pm
Justice Ginsburg went right at it by saying to Solicitor General of the United States Donald Verrilli... [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 5:47 am by Woodruff Family Law Group
The Court held that divorces granted in foreign countries to residents of the United States are not valid and are not enforceable. [read post]