Search for: "United States v. Woodruff" Results 21 - 40 of 44
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2017, 3:45 pm by PBS NewsHour
He still has on his Web site to this day — he’s called for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 6:20 am by Kiran Bhat
United States, the editorial board of The New York Times urges the Court to reverse the petitioner’s conspiracy convictions for violating his Fifth Amendment due process rights. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 6:20 am by Kiran Bhat
United States, the editorial board of The New York Times urges the Court to reverse the petitioner’s conspiracy convictions for violating his Fifth Amendment due process rights. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 3:09 am by John Jenkins
Now this Shearman & Sterling blog reports that the Acting Solicitor General is asking the US Supreme Court to review whether state courts still have jurisdiction over these suits: On May 23, 2017, the Acting Solicitor General filed a brief on behalf of the United States as amicus curiae urging the Supreme Court to grant the petition for a writ of certiorari in Cyan v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 3:30 pm by PBS NewsHour
ANNE GORSUCH BURFORD, Former EPA Administrator: I did submit my resignation to the president of the United States, with regret, last night about 5:00. [read post]
26 Dec 2015, 1:30 pm by Lawrence Solum
Essential reading for anyone who cares about the state of religious freedom in the United States today. [read post]
22 May 2015, 7:02 am by Woodruff Family Law Group
United States, 736 F.3d 66, 67 (1st Cir. 2013) (IRS may deny retroactive relief where case was fully litigated before Notice 2011-70 and IRS did not stipulate that the request was denied solely due to untimeliness). [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 6:19 am
Gay marriage supporters will gather at the Supreme Court Plaza as part of a United for Marriage Coalition's equality rally. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:57 pm by Wolfgang Demino
§ 1692a(6).In Henson, the United States Supreme Court specified that it would only determine whether the defendant was a debt collector pursuant to the second definition of section 1692a(6), i.e., whether the "statutory language defining the term `debt collector' [] embrace[s] anyone who `regularly collects or attempts to collect . . . debts owed or due . . . another.'" 137 S. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 7:24 pm by Schachtman
See “Non-publication of legal opinions in the United States. [read post]