Search for: "United States v. Woodruff"
Results 21 - 40
of 50
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2016, 5:47 am
The Court held that divorces granted in foreign countries to residents of the United States are not valid and are not enforceable. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 2:21 pm
Justice Ginsburg went right at it by saying to Solicitor General of the United States Donald Verrilli... [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 2:24 pm
Molinet v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 8:11 am
United States, 45 F. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 11:59 am
’ State v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 3:09 am
Now this Shearman & Sterling blog reports that the Acting Solicitor General is asking the US Supreme Court to review whether state courts still have jurisdiction over these suits: On May 23, 2017, the Acting Solicitor General filed a brief on behalf of the United States as amicus curiae urging the Supreme Court to grant the petition for a writ of certiorari in Cyan v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 6:23 am
It covers each of the fifty states of the United States, the District of Columbia, the 12 federal Circuit Courts of Appeal and the U.S. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 11:33 am
A date with the Supreme Court: Florida v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 9:40 am
And I argued Baze v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 7:02 am
United States, 736 F.3d 66, 67 (1st Cir. 2013) (IRS may deny retroactive relief where case was fully litigated before Notice 2011-70 and IRS did not stipulate that the request was denied solely due to untimeliness). [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 7:05 am
The Maine Cerebral Palsy Resource Guide was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:17 pm
In United States ex rel. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 7:38 am
Under North Carolina law and the United States Constitution, parents have been granted special protected status, in part to maintain the integrity of families. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 1:13 pm
The position is created pursuant to the state constitution, currently at Article V, Section 1 of the 1970 Illinois Constitution. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:57 pm
§ 1692a(6).In Henson, the United States Supreme Court specified that it would only determine whether the defendant was a debt collector pursuant to the second definition of section 1692a(6), i.e., whether the "statutory language defining the term `debt collector' [] embrace[s] anyone who `regularly collects or attempts to collect . . . debts owed or due . . . another.'" 137 S. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 7:24 pm
See “Non-publication of legal opinions in the United States. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 7:36 am
This Guide was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
“Not since Bush v. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 7:43 am
This guide is a portion of United Cerebral Palsy's One-Stop Resource Guide. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 6:14 am
v=eTnHjYOFuB4"} ) CITIZENS UNITED WON'T GET SECOND LOOK Arizona's law wasn't all the high court tackled. [read post]
