Search for: "United States v. Woodruff"
Results 21 - 40
of 50
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2017, 3:09 am
Now this Shearman & Sterling blog reports that the Acting Solicitor General is asking the US Supreme Court to review whether state courts still have jurisdiction over these suits: On May 23, 2017, the Acting Solicitor General filed a brief on behalf of the United States as amicus curiae urging the Supreme Court to grant the petition for a writ of certiorari in Cyan v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:17 pm
In United States ex rel. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 2:38 pm
The woman sought the return of the child from Puerto Rico to the United States. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 2:45 pm
It ranks 17th among the top 20 chemicals produced in the United States, according to the federal government. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 11:59 am
’ State v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 7:15 am
By Joshua Scott Chilton, Legal Assistant & Receptionist, Woodruff Family Law Group On June 26, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States of America made a ruling in a case known as Obergefell v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 11:57 am
The case is Berens v. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 5:47 am
The Court held that divorces granted in foreign countries to residents of the United States are not valid and are not enforceable. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 8:11 am
United States, 45 F. [read post]
22 May 2015, 7:02 am
United States, 736 F.3d 66, 67 (1st Cir. 2013) (IRS may deny retroactive relief where case was fully litigated before Notice 2011-70 and IRS did not stipulate that the request was denied solely due to untimeliness). [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 2:24 pm
Molinet v. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 11:07 am
See also United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Local Appellate Rule 28.3(b) (Citation Form; Certification) (Aug. 1, 2011) (“For each legal proposition supported by citations in the argument, counsel must cite to any opposing authority if such authority is binding on this court, e.g., U.S. [read post]
1 May 2014, 9:40 am
And I argued Baze v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 1:06 pm
As an amicus, the United States argued that such intent might be implicit in the bilateral investment treaty at issue. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 7:43 am
” Also arguing in favor of vacatur and remand was the United States, which is party to two treaties with similar conditional clauses: Article 11.18 of the 2011 United States-Korea Free Trade Agreement and Article 1121 of the 1992 North American Free Trade Agreement. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 11:14 am
In 2007, after an arbitration in the United States, a panel of three arbitrators issued a final award. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 7:58 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 11:06 am
Department of State, respectively: ? [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 6:14 am
v=eTnHjYOFuB4"} ) CITIZENS UNITED WON'T GET SECOND LOOK Arizona's law wasn't all the high court tackled. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 3:28 pm
I think it does become part of the political -- you would then have the Citizens United decision, the Bush v. [read post]
