Search for: "United States v. Worcester" Results 1 - 20 of 111
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2023, 5:00 pm by Tom Kosakowski
Retirements -- Several Ombuds announced their retirements last year, including:Jim Augustine, University of South CarolinaPaul Kuerbis, Colorado CollegeCraig Mousin, DePaul UniversityMerle Waxman, Yale University (2022) In Memoriam -- Colleagues remembered many Ombuds, including a beloved current and upcoming Ombuds, who passed away in 2023: Mary Childers, retired inaugural Ombuds at Dartmouth CollegeJanet Eckhouse, retired Health Care Ombuds Mediator at Kaiser PermanenteCurtis Grassman, retired… [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 6:22 pm by Ilya Somin
Worcester ed., 1859) (defining "office" as "a publick charge or employment; magistracy");United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 2:36 am by INFORRM
”  United States The Socially Aware blog has published an article examining the case law relating to section 230 of the Communications Decency Act 1996, which shields online service providers from liability in relation to user-generated content. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
" Student accepts internship at ExxonMobil, believing (erroneously) that he had the permanent authorization to work in the United States that ExxonMobil required for the job. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
It seems to run counter to one of the most seminal Indian Law pronouncements by the Court in Worcester v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 11:00 am by Guest Blogger
  And it is this power of the federal government to exclude as well as direct states and non-Indians when it comes to relations with tribes that has a long and well-established pedigree: it was the understanding embodied in the Constitution in the wake of the Articles, advocated for by Native peoples (as Greg Ablavsky and I have traced), and affirmed in the foundational Indian law case of Worcester v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 12:07 am by Frank Cranmer
The ET had erred in its approach because it had failed to engage with the question identified in Eweida and Ors v United Kingdom (2013) 57 EHRR 8; had it done so, it would have concluded that there was a close or direct nexus between her Facebook posts and her protected beliefs. [read post]
30 May 2023, 3:56 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
LaVelle has published Surviving Castro-Huerta: The Historical Perseverance of the Basic Policy of Worcester v. [read post]
Yes, constitutional law has been used to oppress Native people, but at the same time, we want to bring to the fore how Native arguments led, for example, to seminal cases such as Worcester v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 3:31 pm by Kalvis Golde
United States 22-118Issues: (1) Whether the jury clauses of Article III and the Sixth Amendment or the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment bar a court from imposing a more severe criminal sentence on the basis of conduct that a jury necessarily rejected, given its verdicts of acquittal on other counts at the same trial; (2) whether the Supreme Court‘s decision in United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 6:55 am by Jennifer Davis
The Supreme Court also cited Chief Justice John Marshall’s opinion in Worcester v. [read post]
1 May 2022, 1:45 am by Frank Cranmer
In LF v SCRL [2022] EUECJ C‑344/20 (Opinion), Advocate General Medina suggests at [60] that “Article 8 of Directive 2000/78 must be interpreted as permitting Member States to adopt … autonomous protection as a means legitimately to determine, first, whether employees concerned by religious clothing obligations should not be placed, as a matter of principle, in a situation where they might need to choose between observing the obligations deriving… [read post]