Search for: "United States v. Worley" Results 1 - 20 of 27
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Feb 2024, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
Worley have posted Evidence that the President is an "Officer of the United States" for Purposes of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment (Southern California Law Review, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm by Josh Blackman
We cite the corpus linguistics amicus brief written by James Heilpern in Lucia v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm by Josh Blackman
Furthermore, Story would expressly engage in a discussion of the Constitution's "officers of the United States"-language and "office under the United States" three sections later: in Section 791. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  The Positions Clause [1] employs the catch-all term “office, civil or military, under the United States,” whereas the Officials Clause [2] uses the catch-all term “officer of the United States. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 5:55 am
Worley Parsons Melrose Boulevard: Worley Parsons’s building at Melrose Boulevard has a four star rating.Nearly eight years ago green building in South Africa was considered as a “right thing to do” for the environment. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 4:56 am by Amy Howe
In other news on yesterday’s order list, the Court denied cert. in Worley v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 3:00 am by John Day
 In so holding, the court cited several United States Supreme Court decisions that discuss qualified immunity for government employees, such as police officers. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]