Search for: "United States v. Yang" Results 61 - 80 of 172
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2023, 11:47 am by Max Kohn
On June 16, the Supreme Court issued an 8-1 ruling in United States, ex rel. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 2:07 pm by Jim Rossi
Katyal did not have a clear answer to this question – although Assistant to the Solicitor General Anthony Yang (arguing in support of ONEOK on behalf of the United States) later on maintained that federal antitrust remedies would remain available even if the Court finds field preemption. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 10:15 am by Anthony Franze and Jeremy McLaughlin
Yang argued for the United States as amicus in support of Missouri. [read post]
28 Sep 2013, 11:08 am by Schachtman
First, the district saw through the argument that the claimed benzene-APL LNT model was good science because the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) relies upon it. [read post]
Recently, the decisions of courts in the United Kingdom (UK) in Unwired Planet v Huawei Technologies (Unwired Planet) and Optis Cellular Technology v Apple (which followed the decision of the UK Supreme Court in Unwired Planet) have given rise to significant debate over the appropriate forum for litigation of disputes in relation to standard essential patents (SEPs). [read post]
Assistant Solicitor General Anthony Yang was present arguing on behalf of the United States in support of Perez. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:56 pm by Matthew Bush
§ 2000d et. seq., prohibit LMSD’s race related redistricting actions even though the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution may not.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (3d Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief of Pacific Legal FoundationReply of petitioners (forthcoming) Yang v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 9:00 am by Tejinder Singh
  The Supreme Court granted certiorari in Vasquez v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 9:13 pm
If Westlaw is to be believed, Ed’s first argument was in United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 7:01 am by Richard Hunt
H Unit Five, Inc.,  2017 WL 4271433 (D. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 8:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
Petition for Certiorari The FCC and the United States filed a petition for review in the Supreme Court last April. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 11:25 am
  The United States argues that the defendant was the true addressee; hence, why isn't that binding on the government, as an admission that the defendant does have standing? [read post]