Search for: "United States v. Yielding" Results 281 - 300 of 1,698
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2022, 8:40 am by Jennifer Davis
United States, 320 U.S. 81 (1943) and Yasui v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 3:48 pm by Eugene Volokh
Here's a summary of the undisputed facts, to give a sense of the underlying claim (in Levine v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:56 pm by David Kopel
In my view, it is a mistake to conflate support for ever-increasing national government with love of the United States of America. [read post]
19 May 2022, 6:03 am by Kevin Kaufman
Given the high level of taxation on tobacco products—on average, excise taxes alone make up 40 percent of the retail price—a menthol prohibition will assuredly reduce revenues both for federal and state governments, while it is less likely that the policy will yield significant benefits in terms of smoking cessation. [read post]
15 May 2022, 9:11 pm by The Regulatory Review Staff
September 28, 2021 | States Regain Regulatory Power Over Predatory Loan Servicers | The Education Department’s new interpretation of federal law empowers states to protect student loan borrowers. [read post]
11 May 2022, 1:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
… 'forfeited his ability to keep secret his actions at the international border … when he sued United States Customs and Border Patrol agents.'"). [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:48 am by Jim Dempsey
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit said in its 2009 United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
" No, said the California Supreme Court: [W]e are not persuaded that imposing a duty on landlords to withhold rental units from those they believe to be gang members is a fair or workable solution to [the] problem [of gang violence], or one consistent with our state's public policy as a whole. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 6:00 am by Lawrence J. Spiwak
Given the United States’ well-documented (and sordid) experience with public-utility regulation, that’s probably not a good idea. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 7:35 am by Eve Brensike Primus
The state court had properly noted that Davenport would be entitled to relief under Chapman v. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 9:05 pm by Lee Reiners
The Executive Order on digital assets offers six objectives that serve as a natural starting point: protect consumers, investors, and businesses; protect United States and global financial stability and mitigate systemic risk; mitigate the illicit finance and national security risks; reinforce United States leadership in the global financial system and in technological and economic competitiveness; promote access to safe and affordable financial services; and… [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
Here I'll say a word about three odd-numbered amendments, which I'll take in reverse order.Eleventh Amendment: By its terms, the Eleventh Amendment bars suits "against one of the United States by citizens of another state," but in 1890 in Hans v. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 4:09 am by Emma Snell
Treasury Department’s anti-money laundering unit ha [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
While not addressed in the president’s remarks, the Biden White House is planning to introduce a new type of income tax that would fundamentally change the taxation powers in the United States. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 11:33 am by Alden Abbott
In the United States, this movement has been led by populist “neo-Brandeisians” who have “call[ed] instead for enforcement that takes into account firm size, fairness, labor rights, and the protection of smaller enterprises. [read post]