Search for: "United States v. Yielding" Results 121 - 140 of 1,902
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Reversing theDistrict Court’s operative holding, the majority concludedthat for purposes of Section 3, the Presidency is an officeunder the United States and the President is an officer ofthe United States. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 4:38 am by Charles Sartain
Tammany’s zoning ordinances must yield to state law based on La. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:39 pm by Josh Blackman
” (To support the nationwide injunction, Washington argued that immigration law had to be uniform; ironically, the state had opposed this exact argument in United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 1:20 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 3:06 am
--Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of IllinoisOpinion Date: 9/23/09Cite: Bires v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 4:18 pm
Baker (1818) 16 U.S. 541, 545); quite recently, it determined that a fish is not a “tangible object” (United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 1:20 pm by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. [read post]