Search for: "United States v. Yielding" Results 161 - 180 of 1,700
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
The consequentialist version of imperfect procedural justice finds substantial support in the decisions of the Supreme Court that interpret the Due Process Clauses of the United States Constitution. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 8:22 am by Hannah R. Albion
Creative expression through the sale of parody-based dog toys has recently caught the attention of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
25 May 2023, 10:00 am by Guest Author
[1] Appendix V of the Regulatory Program of the United States Government, April 1, 1992–March 31, 1993 The post Circular Reasoning? [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:56 pm
 Pix Credit Audience Chamber Piazza della Signoria Apartments of the Priors c. 1543 In the United States at least, there has been an increasing worry about the state of U.S. relations (economic and political) with Latin American states. [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:21 am by Aida Tohala (Bristows)
On 4 May 2023, a mere two weeks after the conclusion of the hearing, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Sandoz and Teva v BMS. [read post]
In fact, Müller expresses concerns that the expert opinion will yield high royalty rates. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 9:27 am by Eugene Volokh
New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 7:38 am
The company, which has offices in the United States, Europe, the U.K., Asia, and Latin America, will combine management teams and invest in unified global products based on the complementary strengths of both firms. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 7:27 am by Nicole Indelicato
The company, which has offices in the United States, Europe, the U.K., Asia, and Latin America, will combine management teams and invest in unified global products based on the complementary strengths of both firms. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 12:27 pm by Bobby Dexter
United States, Hanna and the firms argued that the IRS is required to notify them and that the summonses should therefore be quashed. [read post]
  The judge’s conclusion on this task was that the FRAND rate was “$0.175 per cellular unit” which “yields a lump sum payment of $138.7m” (paragraphs 813 and 814). [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 8:18 am by Nicholas Round (Bristows)
  The judge’s conclusion on this task was that the FRAND rate was “$0.175 per cellular unit” which “yields a lump sum payment of $138.7m” (paragraphs 813 and 814). [read post]