Search for: "United States v. Young" Results 181 - 200 of 3,172
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2016, 11:39 am by Joel R. Brandes
          Anthimos Panteleris, a citizen of Australia, and Aalison Panteleris, a citizen of the United States, married in the United States in 2005. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 7:18 am by Joel R. Brandes
  Anthimos Panteleris, a citizen of Australia, and Aalison Panteleris, a citizen of the United States, married in the United States in 2005. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
He found that an allegation of breaking up an established family unit, living together, which includes one young child and another on the way is behaviour significantly different from bringing an end to a relationship between a couple who are not living together in an established family unit. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 8:39 am by rprybell
Valerie has argued* two cases before the United States Supreme Court in the last four years, Lafler v. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 10:00 am by Zachary D Spilman
Briggs, No. 19-108 (pet. filed Jul. 22; resp. filed Aug. 14) United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 11:32 am
Joe Harris Sullivan is one of two teenagers that young currently doing life without parole for a nonhomicide offense in the United States. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 3:35 pm
A state may deny access to records available to its citizens pursuant to its Freedom of Information Law to individuals not citizens of that state who make a FOIL request for such records McBurney Et Al. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 11:22 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
Eighth Circuit reviews whether a challenged evidence ruling by the trial court was properly preserved for appeal under FRE 103(b); the issue turned on whether the trial court’s ruling was “tentative” or “definitive”; the objecting party holds the burden to clarify the nature of the ruling, in United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 11:22 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
Eighth Circuit reviews whether a challenged evidence ruling by the trial court was properly preserved for appeal under FRE 103(b); the issue turned on whether the trial court’s ruling was “tentative” or “definitive”; the objecting party holds the burden to clarify the nature of the ruling, in United States v. [read post]