Search for: "United States v. Young"
Results 301 - 320
of 3,696
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2007, 3:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 4:18 am
So it was yesterday at the High Court in Washington, D.C. for argument in the case of United States v Texas, posing an important immigration policy question that tests the very limits of executive branch power.This case presented an evenly divided Court -down one justice following Justice Scalia's sudden death in February- with the task of passing muster on President Obama's innovative immigration policy; a series of recent executive directives made through the… [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 5:19 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:11 pm
Or, looking at the issue another way, does the fact that the conduct permitted by Citizens United was legal in 26 states prior to Citizens United, suggest that politicians are hopelessly corrupt in over half our states? [read post]
23 Dec 2024, 11:18 am
’” That is how Chief Justice Mike McGrath referred to the Montana constitution’s provision that ensures the citizens of Montana the “right to a clean and healthful environment” and on which he grounded the majority’s opinion in his December 18, 2024, holiday gift to the environment and the 16 youth plaintiffs in Held v. [read post]
10 Jun 2005, 5:37 am
In a Booker remand in United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 4:04 am
R. and H. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 4:40 am
United States v. [read post]
22 May 2022, 6:53 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 8:03 am
to the United States permanently. [read post]
27 May 2008, 11:23 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 8:43 am
Indiana, Cause No. 17-1091 before the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
10 May 2012, 5:00 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 2:10 pm
“The law of nations is not embodied in any provision of the Constitution, nor in any treaty, act of Congress, or any authority, or commission derived from the United States. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 11:51 am
Read Holder v. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 7:58 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 3:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 7:54 am
In Pellegrino v. [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 10:03 am
May 7, 2008) (holding that the parties’ custody agreement that stated that after returning to Colombia the child could move to the United States if he so desired was insufficient to establish the petitioner consented to retention of the child in the United States). [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 7:04 am
In United States v. [read post]
