Search for: "United States v. Young" Results 161 - 180 of 3,183
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2020, 12:39 am
Full report: Bailii.R v Secretary of State for the Home Department (No. 2) [2020] EWHC 1036 (Fam) (04 May 2020)Further judgment in dispute between parties regarding the disclosure and inspection of documentation from the successful asylum claim of the mother, into private law family proceedings between her and the father. [read post]
6 May 2020, 12:12 pm by Peter Margulies
§ 1182(f), which empowers the president to bar entry of foreign nationals who would be "detrimental to the interests of the United States. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 11:23 pm by Matthias Weller
A similar approach (with different outcome) has been taken in Ribeiro v Wright, 2020 ONSC 1829, Court of Ontario, Canada. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 5:58 am by Jacquelyn Greene
While this order expires on May 1, 2020, it explicitly states that the Chief Justice fully expects to extend the directives for an additional 30 days and that judicial officials should expect the directives in the order to last throughout May 2020. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
United States The mother of a popular YouTube personality sued a woman for defamation Tuesday, alleging she defamed the plaintiff on Instagram and published private information, including her address. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 3:46 pm by Eugene Volokh
The court then informed the jury that the young attorney who represented Jennings went on to become the President of the United States 27 years later. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 12:52 pm by Josh Blackman
Sobol fought the case all the way to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 10:41 am by Peter Margulies
§ 1182(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), which authorizes the president to bar entry of foreign nationals “detrimental to the interests of the United States”—the same provision that Trump used for his travel ban, which the Supreme Court upheld in Trump v. [read post]
11 Apr 2020, 5:16 am by Schachtman
A German court enjoined Augustine from falsely claiming that the Bair Hugger led to increased bacterial contamination.[7] The United States FDA considered and rejected Augustine’s claims, and recommended the use of FAWDs. [read post]