Search for: "United States v. Yung" Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2010, 1:21 pm by Miguel Larios
Supreme Court handed down an opinion in United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 3:54 pm by Daniel Solove
His work related to sex offenders has been cited by federal courts and, in particular, the United States Supreme Court majority opinion in Kennedy v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 5:27 am by SOIssues
Supreme Court handed down an opinion in United States v. [read post]
31 May 2010, 9:44 pm by Daniel Solove
His work related to sex offenders has been cited by federal courts and, in particular, the United States Supreme Court majority opinion in Kennedy v. [read post]
13 Sep 2008, 11:38 am
(For those of you following Kennedy closely, Professor Yung also provides a Kennedy v. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 9:11 pm
His sex crimes scholarship has recently focused on the punishment and regulation of sex offenders and was cited by the United States Supreme Court majority opinion in Kennedy v. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 8:04 pm by Bill Ward
At the heart of this case is a question similar to those that are under consideration by the United States Supreme Court in the Florida case, Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 7:29 pm
View the article here Corey Rayburn Yung John Marshall Law School, Chicago August, 01 2008 Abstract: In 2003, the United States Supreme Court issued its only two opinions regarding the constitutionality of sex offender registration and notification statutes. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 6:06 pm
That was my initial reaction when I read the opening of United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 4:07 pm
" and here is the abstract:On June 25, 2008, the United States Supreme Court issued an opinion in Kennedy v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 4:05 am
Anthony California, Inc., et al. (11/13/2007, non-precedential): affirmed appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California (case no. 03-CV-874); no reasoning provided within the opinion HIF Bio, Inc., et al. v. [read post]