Search for: "United States v. Zack" Results 1 - 20 of 58
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2009, 10:46 pm
I know I’m missing some folks, but at a minimum we had trademark law bloggers and readers from France, Spain, England, China, Australia, New Zealand, Brazil, Germany, Canada, Finland, Switzerland, South Africa, the Netherlands, and many cities throughout the United States. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 7:23 pm by Dwight Sullivan
  RCM 1004(c)(6) indicates that the death penalty for rape is authorized when the offense was committed in time of war and in territory in which the United States or its ally was an occupying power or in which the United States armed forces were engaged in active hostilities. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 6:41 am by Elina Saxena
Wells  also  linked to the United States’ en banc petition in United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 7:53 am by Alex R. McQuade
Benjamin Wittes outlined why Donald Trump is a national security threat to the United States of America. [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 7:12 am by Cody M. Poplin
Later, David Bosco expanded on Bellinger’s piece, examining the merit's of the U.S.'s concerns over the aggression amendments, and why it is increasingly difficult for the United States to prevent their adoption. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:22 am by Susan Brenner
Bynum, Brief for the United States 2008 WL 4974084. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 3:25 am by SHG
Last Thursday, however, a far-right panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit effectively eliminated state prisoners’ right to seek what is known as a “writ of habeas corpus” when they are imprisoned in violation of the Constitution or federal law, except in cases of “factual innocence. [read post]