Search for: "United Truck Lines, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission"
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Motor Carrier Exemption Applies to Drivers Who can be Expected to Drive Interstate Continue Reading…
19 May 2015, 11:24 am
McComb, a United States Supreme Court case decided in 1947 regarding the jurisdiction of the DOT’s predecessor, the Interstate Commerce Commission (“ICC”). [read post]
19 May 2015, 11:24 am
McComb, a United States Supreme Court case decided in 1947 regarding the jurisdiction of the DOT’s predecessor, the Interstate Commerce Commission (“ICC”). [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 2:31 pm
In Council Tree Investors Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:59 pm
In a sense, Tuesday’s argument in American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 12:11 pm
Although these trips did not cross state lines, they nonetheless met the de minimus interstate commerce requirement because they transported freight “in interstate commerce, either as part of continuous interstate movements or of interstate movements begun or terminated in metropolitan Detroit. [read post]
28 May 2020, 4:51 pm
For HOS regulations to apply, the driver’s property-carrying commercial motor vehicle must (1) be used on public highways in interstate commerce and (2) meet certain gross vehicle weight standards. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:47 pm
American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 6:00 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
WorldCom, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 8:51 am
In New Prime Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
This case includes the following issues: (1) Does the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act [ICCTA] (49 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 12:44 pm
(Alon USA Energy, Inc., et al., Real Parties in Interest) (2017) ___ Cal.App.5th _____. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
The cases, listed newest to oldest, and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
