Search for: "Unpublished Disposition" Results 1 - 20 of 386
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2019, 7:55 am by Howard Wasserman
Rev. 1 (2019), arguing that unpublished opinions should at least explain the reasoning for the benefit of the (often pro se) litigants. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 12:59 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  The unpublished portion of the opinion (which won’t be further discussed in detail) held that the City’s statement of overriding considerations was supported by substantial evidence, did not need to “describe in detail the weight accorded to the various aspects of the agency’s balancing of competing public objectives,” and did not need to include findings “reconciling” the project approval with the CIty’s rejection of an earlier,… [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:40 am by Carolina Attorneys
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:38 am by Carolina Attorneys
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:28 am by Carolina Attorneys
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 2:16 pm by Tatiana Venn
Back in January, I said, quote, The Government will — the Court will hold a post-discovery hearing to ascertain the adequacy of State’s searches; to determine if Judicial Watch needs to depose additional witnesses, including Hillary Clinton or her former Chief of Staff, Cheryl Mills; and to schedule dispositive motions, unquote. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 9:44 am by jfarrell
Back in January, I said, quote, The Government will — the Court will hold a post-discovery hearing to ascertain the adequacy of State’s searches; to determine if Judicial Watch needs to depose additional witnesses, including Hillary Clinton or her former Chief of Staff, Cheryl Mills; and to schedule dispositive motions, unquote. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 7:56 am by Arthur F. Coon
In an opinion originally filed on July 31, and belatedly ordered published on August 22, 2019, the Second District Court of Appeal (Division 3) affirmed a judgment granting a CEQA writ petition invalidating the final EIR and project entitlements for the Millennium Project, a controversial proposed mixed-use development on a 4.47-acre parcel straddling Vine Street and surrounding the historic Capital Records Building in Hollywood. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 4:47 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  An area resident appealed the ZA’s decision to the Planning Commission, and then to the City Council, and after various interim steps in the City’s administrative proceedings (plaintiffs’ challenges to some of which are discussed in the opinion’s unpublished portion) the MND and project approval were upheld by the Council. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 10:00 am by Zachary D Spilman
First, on October 19, 2018, the CCA denied a petition for a writ of mandamus in an unpublished decision. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 6:45 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
Sep 27, 2018) (unpublished), and the opinion of this Court in United States v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 11:21 am by Sara DePasquale
If DSS meets its burden, the juvenile is adjudicated abused, neglected, or dependent and the case proceeds to disposition. [read post]
8 May 2019, 10:48 am by John L. Mays, Attorney at Law
Facts of the Case In a recent (unpublished) case considered on appeal by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, the plaintiff was a woman who was terminated from her employment by the defendant grocery store after she took maternity leave in 2009. [read post]
8 May 2019, 10:30 am by Matthew Scott Johnson
Beyer’s unpublished manuscript entitled Controlling Body Disposition: The Law and the Macabre is cited in the following article: Meredith M. [read post]
7 May 2019, 9:44 am by Mazzoni Karam Petorak & Valvano
And, in the case of certain offenses, the Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition (ARD) program offers them. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 4:27 pm by Arthur F. Coon
The Supreme Court granted review of the unpublished appellate decision in this case on November 14, 2018, and will address whether issuance of a well permit pursuant to state groundwater well-drilling standards is a discretionary decision subject to CEQA review, or a ministerial decision outside of CEQA’s scope. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 11:24 am by Mark Ashton
 The Supreme Court ordered that unpublished decisions decided as of May 1, 2019 may be cited in briefs and arguments but do not have the weight of stare decisis. [read post]