Search for: "Unpublished Disposition" Results 101 - 120 of 394
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2016, 9:07 am by Liisa Speaker
The Newman court reversed the trial court decision and remanded the matter back to evaluate the parents, prepare a parent-agency plan, order visitation and continue monitoring in order to properly determine a final disposition. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 8:16 pm
(October 18, 2016)— Imagine if attorneys could counsel their clients on how long judges typically take to resolve cases, how they rule on dispositive motions, and how often they are overturned on appeal. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
First, the Seventh Circuit decision being reviewed by the Supreme Court was itself embodied in an unpublished ruling, styled (as such things are in the Seventh Circuit) as a “Nonprecedential Disposition. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 1:07 pm by Jamie Markham
Adding to the confusion is the fact that some disposition codes available in relation to criminal charges are not available in probation matters. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 1:07 pm by Jamie Markham
Adding to the confusion is the fact that some disposition codes available in relation to criminal charges are not available in probation matters. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 10:41 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
In a separate unpublished memorandum disposition, we address Benally’s challenge to the trial proceedings and sentence. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 6:50 pm by Arthur F. Coon
(This post will not address the end-user disclosure issue, which was discussed in the opinion’s unpublished portion, or the general plan consistency issue, which is covered in my partner Bryan Wenter’s Land Use Developments blog post here.) [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 3:26 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  (Because these holdings are explained in the unpublished portion of the opinion, they are merely provided for context and will not be discussed further in this post.) [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 5:12 pm by Curt Cutting
  That award was ultimately deemed constitutionally excessive in this unpublished opinion, but the path to that result was a rocky one, and I have doubts about whether the Court of Appeal's disposition is procedurally correct.The procedural weirdness began in the trial court, where the court issued a rolling series of rulings on the defendants' post-trial motions.After the jury's verdict, the trial court entered judgment and the plaintiffs served notice of entry… [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 12:48 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  The 10-page published portion of the Court’s 27-page opinion held the City’s EIR and project approvals must be set aside and the EIR’s energy analysis brought into compliance with CEQA; the remaining unpublished portion of the opinion (not discussed in detail in this post) agreed with and affirmed the trial court’s rulings that the EIR’s transportation/traffic and noise analyses were adequate and that the project was not inconsistent with applicable… [read post]
24 May 2016, 3:55 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In a brief – and somewhat odd – opinion filed April 22, and belatedly ordered partially published on May 20, 2016, the Fourth District Court of Appeal reversed a trial court judgment denying a petition for writ of mandate challenging a General Plan Amendment (GPA) adopted by the City of Palm Springs as categorically exempt from CEQA. [read post]
20 May 2016, 8:06 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The panel addressed the defendant’s remaining arguments concerning her conviction and sentencing in a memorandum disposition The Ninth Circuit’s unpublished memorandum decision on jurisdiction is here. [read post]
11 May 2016, 11:31 am by Arthur F. Coon
The firm has expertise in all real property matters, including full-service litigation and dispute resolution services, transactions, acquisitions, dispositions, leasing, financing, common interest development, construction, management, eminent domain and inverse condemnation, title insurance, environmental law and land use. [read post]
3 May 2016, 12:55 pm by Roy M. Doppelt
At issue in this case was the disposition of more than one million shares of stock. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 1:46 pm by Arthur F. Coon
The trial and appellate courts held the District’s Addendum was inadequate under CEQA to cover its changes in course regarding the Building 20 area’s disposition. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 3:23 pm
(The California Supreme Court tends not to review unpublished opinions.) [read post]