Search for: "Unpublished Disposition" Results 101 - 120 of 358
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2017, 2:02 pm
Lopez, 83 So.3d 710 (Fla. 2012), is an unpublished disposition, approving an uncontested report of referee; thus, it cannot constitute `case law’ providing a reasonable basis for the referee's recommendation. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 11:45 am by Mack Sperling
That's because there might be a "secret rule," based on Judge Robinson's (unpublished) Order last week in Carmayer LLC v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 6:41 am
`A party may seek intervention as of right if the party has “an interest” and is “so situated that the disposition of the action may as a practical matter impair or impede the applicant's ability to protect that interest, unless the applicant's interest is adequately represented by existing parties. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 4:50 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The California Court of Appeals’ unpublished March 8, 2017 opinion can be found here. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 10:14 am by Bernadette Duran-Brown
  If you recall, the Supreme Court granted review of Young’s Market and tied it to the fate of Property Reserve stating that “Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration and disposition of related issues in Property Reserve v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 7:15 pm by FDABlog HPM
Notwithstanding, in support of its position that these practitioner summary dispositions are appropriate, DEA often points to two unpublished federal appeals decisions, Hooper v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:18 pm by Josh Blackman
Contemporaneously with the published opinion, the panel also issued an unpublished briefing order, which asked the parties to file further briefs throughout the month of March. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 10:08 am by Arthur F. Coon
My blog post on the Sixth District’s now unpublished and unciteable decision can be found here, for the benefit of those who enjoy post-mortems and reading judicial tea leaves to try to discern why the Supreme Court decides to erase particular CEQA precedents. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 10:27 am by Liisa Speaker
In Re Jones, unpublished per curiam, issued November 8, 2016 (Docket 332616). [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 9:07 am by Liisa Speaker
The Newman court reversed the trial court decision and remanded the matter back to evaluate the parents, prepare a parent-agency plan, order visitation and continue monitoring in order to properly determine a final disposition. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 8:16 pm
(October 18, 2016)— Imagine if attorneys could counsel their clients on how long judges typically take to resolve cases, how they rule on dispositive motions, and how often they are overturned on appeal. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
First, the Seventh Circuit decision being reviewed by the Supreme Court was itself embodied in an unpublished ruling, styled (as such things are in the Seventh Circuit) as a “Nonprecedential Disposition. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 1:07 pm by Jamie Markham
Adding to the confusion is the fact that some disposition codes available in relation to criminal charges are not available in probation matters. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 1:07 pm by Jamie Markham
Adding to the confusion is the fact that some disposition codes available in relation to criminal charges are not available in probation matters. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 10:41 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
In a separate unpublished memorandum disposition, we address Benally’s challenge to the trial proceedings and sentence. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 6:50 pm by Arthur F. Coon
(This post will not address the end-user disclosure issue, which was discussed in the opinion’s unpublished portion, or the general plan consistency issue, which is covered in my partner Bryan Wenter’s Land Use Developments blog post here.) [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 3:26 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  (Because these holdings are explained in the unpublished portion of the opinion, they are merely provided for context and will not be discussed further in this post.) [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 12:48 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  The 10-page published portion of the Court’s 27-page opinion held the City’s EIR and project approvals must be set aside and the EIR’s energy analysis brought into compliance with CEQA; the remaining unpublished portion of the opinion (not discussed in detail in this post) agreed with and affirmed the trial court’s rulings that the EIR’s transportation/traffic and noise analyses were adequate and that the project was not inconsistent with applicable… [read post]
24 May 2016, 3:55 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In a brief – and somewhat odd – opinion filed April 22, and belatedly ordered partially published on May 20, 2016, the Fourth District Court of Appeal reversed a trial court judgment denying a petition for writ of mandate challenging a General Plan Amendment (GPA) adopted by the City of Palm Springs as categorically exempt from CEQA. [read post]