Search for: "UnumProvident" Results 1 - 19 of 19
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2015, 12:00 am by Saqib Saeed
For more information, visit: bad fait lawsuitsThe post Another Punitive Damages Verdict Against UnumProvident appeared first on Disability Insurance Attorney. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 8:46 am by admin
The legal theories and approaches in the case were approved by the court when UnumProvident tried to get the case dismissed. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 10:27 pm
As reported in the Worcester Telegram, a federal court jury in Nevada awarded $60 million in punitive damages against Paul Revere Life Insurance Company and UnumProvident Corporation in a case for wrongful denial of a disability claim. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 8:49 am by admin
A Nevada jury has returned yet another bad faith disability verdict against Unum and Paul Revere in the amount of $60 million. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 11:40 am by Frankel & Newfield
Our client is a vascular surgeon who suffers from numerous co-morbid conditions, including Chronic and Recurrent Alcoholism, Hepatitis C, Fatigue, Diabetes, Hemochromatosis, Hyperparathyroidism, Lumbosacral Disc Herniations, Degenerative Disc Disease, Facet Arthopathy, Forominal Stenosis, Chronic Pain, Depression, and Anxiety. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 3:26 pm
In last week's verdicts, the jury ordered Paul Revere Life Insurance Co. to pay $24 Million and UnumProvident Corporation was ordered to pay $36 Million. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 8:50 am by admin
Based upon the existence of evidence as to the scheme of Unum, Unumprovident and its subsidiaries, claimants suing those companies may be placed on a more equal footing. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 6:23 pm by Michael Stevens
UnumProvident Corporation     Eastern District of Tennessee of Chattanooga 09a0022n.06  USA v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 6:23 pm by Michael Stevens
UnumProvident Corporation     Eastern District of Tennessee of Chattanooga 09a0022n.06  USA v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:03 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
UnumProvident Corp., 464 F.3d 1260, 1272 (11th Cir. 2006) (“Under § 1292(b), appellate review, even for certified questions, is discretionary . . . . [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
Following the completion of its overhaul of Rules 26(b)(1) and 37(e) (see our most recent post here), the federal Advisory Committee on Civil Rules is set to take up Fed. [read post]