Search for: "Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA" Results 1 - 20 of 205
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2023, 7:53 am by Dan Farber
Unlike them industry is pitching this as a normal regulatory disagreement and claims to share EPA’s goals. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 3:49 am by SHG
Id., at ___, ___ (quoting Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
23 May 2023, 7:46 am by Daniel Bosch
In that case, the Court found that the EPA did not have authority under Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act to promulgate emissions caps. [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Series of Essays
Wagner, University of Texas at Austin School of Law Court disregards the Clean Air Act’s clear language in applying the major questions doctrine to curb EPA’s climate authority. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 9:36 am by Guest Author
Before West Virginia, some scholars began calling the doctrine a clear-statement rule, particularly after the Court referred to the lack of “clear congressional authorization” for the agency action in Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 2:47 pm by Josh Blackman
Oregon, Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
Second, we present evidence on public-company disclosures consistent with issuers’ understanding that the SEC has long had authority to take regulatory action in this area. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 10:09 pm by Josh Blackman
Here is the cited passage from the Alabama case: We expect Congress to speak clearly when authorizing an agency to exercise powers of "vast 'economic and political significance.'" Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 9:37 pm by Josh Blackman
We expect Congress to speak clearly when authorizing an agency to exercise powers of "vast 'economic and political significance.'" Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]