Search for: "VENUS v. UNITED STATES" Results 41 - 60 of 1,127
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2021, 7:53 am by Dennis Crouch
Whether the equities lie considerably against granting mandamus, United States v. [read post]
  In the class action, Primus purported to represent “[a]ll persons entitled to freely attend schools, shopping locations, churches, entertainment venues, and workplaces in the United States without the intrusion of individuals armed ... [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 3:00 pm by Josh Blackman
Blount did not hold himself out as a representative of the United States government. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 12:42 pm by Grayson Clary
If these facts sound familiar to Lawfare readers, it’s likely because of their resemblance to United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 8:51 am by Florian Mueller
Instead, Conti has now brought a new complaint specifically against Nokia in Delaware state court, and that one has the potential to become one of the most interesting FRAND cases worldwide (this post continues below the document):21-01-25 Continental v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Illegal immigrant brought to the United States in 2000, when he was three years old, is arrested by ICE and released on bond while his immigration proceedings move forward. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 11:10 am by Amy Howe
Jackson Women’s Health Org., the challenge to a Mississippi law that generally bans abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy, and United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 2:26 pm by
The current federal standard dates to the Supreme Court of the United States’ decision in Celotex Corp. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 5:49 am by Ralf Michaels
By contrast, the success of the Hague Choice of Court Convention is of fundamental importance for the UK, given that it wishes to encourage parties to choose its courts as the venue for dispute resolution and to have judgments given by those courts recognised and enforced elsewhere. [read post]
2 Jan 2021, 2:21 am by Florian Mueller
In my two previous posts today, I published and discussed Samsung's opposition to Ericsson's motion for a preliminary injunction and the accompanying sworn declaration by the former Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Professor Randall R. [read post]