Search for: "VENUS v. UNITED STATES" Results 101 - 120 of 1,479
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2021, 9:15 am by Gene Quinn
Jordan of the United States Federal District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, issued a rather atypical Order, at least for the Eastern District of Texas. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 10:03 am by Michael Elkon
        On August 26, 2009, CertainTeed removed the state court action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 11:18 am by Dennis Crouch
  In particular, the statute states plainly that venue is proper in any judicial district: (3) a defendant not resident in the United States may be sued in any judicial district … 28 USC 1391(c)(3). [read post]
31 May 2017, 1:00 pm by Gene Quinn
On May 22, 2017, the United States Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated decision in TC Heartland LLC v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 10:00 am by Wells Bennett
 Proceedings in the military commission case of United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 5:40 am by Wells Bennett
 This marks the third day of this week’s four-day motions session in United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 5:36 am by Wells Bennett
Your correspondent returns to Fort Meade’ Burba Cottage—our usual CCTV venue, Smallwood Hall, being unavailable—to take in another day of piped-in-from-Guantanamo hearings in United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 3:51 pm
  The majority opinion holds that under the federal venue statute, you have to charge the defendant in the state that the aircraft was flying over at the particular time of the assault, not (as here) merely in the venue in which the plane landed. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 9:18 am by Christine A. Gaddis
” The court noted that the defendant made and sold generic pharmaceutical products which are distributed in the United States, including Delaware. [read post]
23 May 2017, 9:20 am by Jo Dale Carothers
For over 25 years, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the United States district courts have interpreted the patent venue statute 28 U.S.C. [read post]
23 May 2017, 9:20 am by Jo Dale Carothers
For over 25 years, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the United States district courts have interpreted the patent venue statute 28 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 10:00 pm
The 11th Amendment to the US Constitution limits the "judicial power of the United States"so that it does not "extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State. [read post]
In so finding, the Federal Circuit relied upon its previous Hatch-Waxman venue ruling in Valeant Pharmaceuticals v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 5:40 am by Wells Bennett
 This marks the third day of this week’s four-day motions session in United States v. [read post]