Search for: "VENUS v. UNITED STATES" Results 121 - 140 of 1,127
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Ingrid Wuerth
If the foreign state is not immune, 1605B also creates a cause of action for nationals of the United States against the foreign state. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 9:15 am by Gene Quinn
Jordan of the United States Federal District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, issued a rather atypical Order, at least for the Eastern District of Texas. [read post]
In Morrison, the Supreme Court limited investors’ ability to bring private 10b-5 securities fraud actions to cases where the securities at issue were purchased on a United States stock exchange or were otherwise purchased in the U.S. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 1:51 pm by Joel R. Brandes
’s habitual residence to the United States, regardless of his ability to enter the United States. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 8:51 pm by Tim Banks @TM_Banks
“[R]estraints imposed on government to pry into the lives of the citizen go to the essence of a democratic state” (R. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 2:40 am by Susan Brenner
In the United States, the venue is either a county (for cases in state court) or a district or division (for cases in federal court). [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 1:31 pm by WIMS
Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit, Case No. 09-5388, Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky at Owensboro. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 7:15 pm by Maureen Johnston
Suesz 14-370 Issue: Whether the term “judicial district” in section 1692i of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act should be defined with respect to state law, by determining the smallest unit into which the state consistently and uniformly divides itself (as is the rule in the Second Circuit), or whether the term should be given a federal common law definition that asks what is the smallest geographic area relevant for state court venue (as… [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 8:15 am by Aaron S. Weiss
In Bristol-Myers Squibb, the United States Supreme Court rejected California’s “sliding scale approach” to assertions of specific personal jurisdiction. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 8:15 am by Aaron S. Weiss
In Bristol-Myers Squibb, the United States Supreme Court rejected California’s “sliding scale approach” to assertions of specific personal jurisdiction. [read post]