Search for: "VERMONT v. NEW YORK" Results 21 - 40 of 606
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2020, 4:17 am by Chris Castle
Act. 6993, Delaware Chancery Court (Mar. 30, 2012) at 12; Brief of Amici Curiae Attorneys General for the Commonwealths of Kentucky, Massachusetts, and Pennsylvania, the States of Arizona, Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, South… [read post]
Earlier efforts began in 2019: New Mexico (SB 176); New York (A 6351, S 4411); Pennsylvania (HB 1049); Rhode Island (S 234, H 5930); and Texas (HB 4518). [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
These new products, along with a greater consciousness about the dangers of smoking, have prompted millions to give up smoking. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 2:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Connecticut, Minnesota, Vermont, and New York will see increases in their estate tax exemptions (taxpayer-friendly provisions), while Hawaii’s estate tax will become more burdensome. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 1:58 pm by Herskovits, PLLC
Metlife, 8 N.Y.3d 359 (2007) (where New York’s highest court ruled that defamatory statements on a Form U5 are subject to an absolute privilege). [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings Following the 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 8:10 am by Jessica Arons
Vermont and Rhode Island also acted to ensure that the right to make decisions regarding pregnancy will remain protected in their states, regardless of what the Supreme Court might do to Roe v. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
In light of states’ differing responses to the Wayfair v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 8:53 am by Zalkind Duncan & Bernstein LLP
  More recently-enacted laws, like New York’s 2019 Unlawful Dissemination or Publication of an Intimate Image, include the “intent to cause harm” language to limit First Amendment concerns. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 12:12 pm
  The court refers to its prior affirmance of the FCC’s common carrier reclassification decision, United States Telecommunications Ass’n. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 12:12 pm
  The court refers to its prior affirmance of the FCC’s common carrier reclassification decision, United States Telecommunications Ass’n. v. [read post]