Search for: "VERMONT v. NEW YORK" Results 41 - 60 of 608
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2019, 12:12 pm
  The court refers to its prior affirmance of the FCC’s common carrier reclassification decision, United States Telecommunications Ass’n. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 12:12 pm
  The court refers to its prior affirmance of the FCC’s common carrier reclassification decision, United States Telecommunications Ass’n. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2019, 5:24 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
  Non-attending governors  of Vermont, Connecticut, Kansas, Minnesota, and Oregon all gave their approval of the document. but it was conspicuously declined by those (non-attending) of New YorkNew Jersey, Delaware, Kentucky, and Missouri (and the attending governor of Maryland) [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 6:17 am by PaulKostro
If the child had previously relocated to New York and temporarily returned to New Jersey, albeit on a regular basis, then, for purposes of determining the child’s home state, those times would be counted as time that the child lived in New York. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
For instance, Maryland permits local governments to provide a credit for expanding manufacturing facilities.[6] Similarly, Idaho allows counties to exempt TPP that is part of an investment of at least $500,000 in a new manufacturing plant for up to five years.[7] Seven states (Delaware, Hawaii,  Illinois, Iowa, New York, Ohio, and Pennsylvania)  exempt all TPP from taxation, while another five states (Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North… [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 8:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
New York and Vermont made changes under their property tax code to capture more tax revenue from property transfers. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2019-06-15 https://t.co/d7zcEqbBWl 2019-06-16 Dotcom extradition: Copyright breaches could still be criminal conspiracy, Crown says https://t.co/On8Rr6rfXE 2019-06-16 Canada’s trademark changes mean higher fees, more complexities in filing https://t.co/IDzM1OkNfK 2019-06-16 Computer and Internet Updates for 2019-06-16 https://t.co/6L0UnzSyKe 2019-06-17 Vermont Supreme Court Reads Revenge Porn Law Narrowly https://t.co/kFWR7CJlT5… [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The New York law shores up reproductive rights so they will be protected even if Roe v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:47 pm by Bennett L. Epstein
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (covering Connecticut, New York, and Vermont) recently acknowledged that there is no protection for such workers. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
It would also mean that candidates would have incentives to campaign in (and tailor policies to) all places where there were significant numbers of undecided voters, not just so-called swing states where the median voter is in play.The agreement, by its own terms, would not go into effect until a sufficient number of states to comprise a majority of the electoral college—that is, states whose electoral college allotments collectively total 270 or more—ratify it.Since I last discussed the… [read post]