Search for: "VINCENT v. PEOPLE OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA"
Results 1 - 20
of 50
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
And there is no First Amendment exception or California anti-SLAPP law exception for 13 Reasons Why. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 3:26 pm
Riehl shows how Vincent AI can compare legal jurisdictions by generating memorandums on the same question for California, New York, the UK, and Spain. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
And there is no First Amendment exception or California anti-SLAPP law exception for 13 Reasons Why. [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:15 am
The transaction raised eyebrows due to Sun’s ties to the CCP and his former military service with the People’s Liberation Army (PLA). [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 10:47 am
Scott Fitzgerald (born September 24, 1896, in Saint Paul, Minnesota; died December 21, 1940, in Los Angeles, California). [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 9:51 am
Launched in 2018, Lensa is a product of Prisma Labs — a company based in Sunnyvale, California that recently topped the iOS app store’s free chart. [read post]
12 May 2022, 7:17 am
Cal.) in Weiss v. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 2:41 am
Resources Data Harvesting and Profiling: Ricci v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 12:23 pm
In the unpublished case from California, Henry v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
In Rimini Street, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 1:06 pm
Clorox Co. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
One of the more incredible allegations about Prenda Law, the copyright-trolling operation that sued people for downloading movies online, was that the lawyers behind Prenda and its associated companies might have created and uploaded some of the porn, simply as a way of catching more offenders. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 8:41 am
It can thus be seen that the decision has First Amendment implications which safeguard people’s right to free speech and this was valued as being the greater consideration. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 10:21 am
This case is one of the ten that the AABANY has created, the full list can be found below: The Constitution in a Time of War: The Trial of Minoru Yasui (2007) Building Our Legacy: The Murder of Vincent Chin (2008) The Massie Cases: Race, Honor, and Justice In Depression-Era Hawaii (2009) The Trial of Tokyo Rose: United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 6:04 am
A majority of the California Supreme Court did not so hold in People v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm
—Humberto Morales Moreno, Universidad Autonoma de Puebla Author Meets Reader: Carol Steiker & Jordan Steiker, Courting Death: The Supreme Court and Capital PunishmentTue, 6/20: 12:45 PM - 2:30 PM – Sheraton Maria Isabel Imperio C (2nd Floor) · Authors—Carol Steiker, Harvard Law School and Jordan Steiker, University of Texas School of Law · … [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 11:16 am
California (1971) (upholding the right to display vulgarities) and Cantwell v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:15 pm
California, 29 Wm. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm
For those wondering what authorized the police to go through the garbage without a warrant or probable cause, the answer is that the Supreme Court held in California v. [read post]
