Search for: "VINCENT v. VINCENT" Results 1 - 20 of 1,261
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2009, 8:25 am
TOM VINCENT and DANIELLE VINCENT, Defendants and Appellees. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 2:54 pm by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 09-0466, 2010 MT 57, HELEN VINCENT, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 6:32 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Illegal sentence — Insufficient evidence Following a 1986 trial in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County, a jury found Vincent Cole, appellant, guilty of first-degree felony murder, burglary, daytime housebreaking, and robbery. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 7:42 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Traffic stop Jermail Young and Vincent Palmisano, appellants, were both charged, by criminal indictment, with possession of a controlled dangerous substance with intent to distribute, conspiracy to possess a controlled dangerous substance with intent to distribute, and several other related charges. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 2:54 am by sally
Industrious Ltd v Vincent Employment Appeal Tribunal “An employment tribunal had jurisdiction to determine whether a compromise agreement which satisfied section 203(3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and which would otherwise prevent the claimant from pursuing an unfair dismissal claim was unenforceable because of misrepresentation. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 8:14 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Illegal sentence — Merger of drug possession and manufacturing After a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Garrett County, appellant, Jeffrey Vincent Corby, was convicted of manufacturing methamphetamine (Md. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 6:27 am by Daily Record Staff
Contracts — Breach — Partnership agreement In a first amended complaint filed in the Circuit Court for Howard County, five siblings in the Trasatti family—Joseph, Michael, Gabriel, Anthony, and Rose Trasatti Heim (“the Limited Partners”)—and Carmela Property, LLLP (“the Partnership”), the appellants, sued their other two siblings—Andrew and Vincent, Jr. [read post]
22 May 2007, 5:15 am
Contrary to conventional wisdom, the outcome in Vincent v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 2:32 pm by John Steele
Vincent challenges his convictions for theft and petty theft with a prior, contending primarily that by virtue of his inactive Nevada license his status as an attorney was not a false pretense. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 5:18 pm by Jeff Gittins
Last week, the Utah Supreme Court issued its opinion in Delta Canal Co. v. [read post]