Search for: "VOWELL v. STATE" Results 1 - 20 of 24
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2011, 1:13 am
486/07, Ford Motor Company v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Unnecessarily Long and Pompous Name), Alkar Automotive, SA.   [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 3:31 pm
That mark would be pronounced as two syllables and not three, contrary to what the Board of Appeal stated as an alternative in its decision. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 3:40 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Sarah Vowell weighs in on Espinoza v. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 3:49 am
’” Applicant acknowledged that “the parties’ marks are visually similar because they both contain the vowels and letters IELA/IELLA in the same order and combination. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 11:44 am
So when a Wisconsin state court lets loose with an excellent preemption decision, we figure it's worth taking a look.Blunt involved a claimed defect in a cardiac defibrillator - one of those implanted gadgets that stands by to stabilize heart rhythm (love that word, unique in the English language with more syllables than vowels) in people with chronic heart problems. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:28 pm by Charles Fox
In Illinois we finally have an observation law as do some other states. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 1:57 am
So a judge in Allegheny county, in Clifton v. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Low-consonant, low-frequency vowel names for large cars; high-consonant, high vowel frequency brand name for fast cars. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
Vowell, No. 06-5742, 06-6535 Sentences imposed after defendants pleaded guilty to coercing a minor to engage in sexually explicit conduct for the purpose of producing a visual depiction of that conduct, and possession of child pornography, are affirmed where both sentences were reasonable and one defendant had adequate notice of the district court's intention to sentence her above the Guidelines range. . [read post]