Search for: "Vaca v. Sipes" Results 1 - 7 of 7
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2009, 4:15 am
This would move most duty of fair representation disputes from the ex-post stage (after a court dispute has arisen) to the ex-ante stage (before a court dispute has arisen) and reduce unnecessary litigation.Second, this Article argues that the current system needs to be "tweaked" to return to the original Vaca v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 7:27 am by Joy Waltemath
Noting that Greenslade got the language from Bugg v Allied Industrial Workers Local 507, which expressly attributed it to the Supreme Court’s decision in Vaca v Sipes and other hybrid contract/DFR opinions, the appeals court found that this “approach does not bear any evident relation to Title VII;” thus, the court withdrew the language. [read post]