Search for: "Valentino v. Valentino"
Results 21 - 40
of 71
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2019, 4:02 am
Cheshire Bridge Holdings, LLC v City of Atlanta, 2019 WL 2406502 (11th Cir CA 6/7/2019) [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 1:45 pm
For health care providers concerned about the effect the Covenant Medical Center v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 5:20 pm
Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 3:48 am
The court or tribunal will have to determine what the defendant knew (the subjective element) and to determine whether his actions to register the mark with such knowledge would be regarded as being in bad faith by persons adopting proper standards (the objective element) (Valentino Globe v Pacific Rim Industries [2010] 2 SLR 1203, Wing Joo Loong Ginseng Hong (Singapore) Co Pte Ltd v Qinghai Xinyuan Foreign Trade Co Ltd [2009] 2 SLR (R) 814). [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 12:10 pm
In Naperville Smart Meter Awareness v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 4:09 am
Marinelli v Sullivan Papain Block McGrath & Cannavo, P.C. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 3:16 am
July 10, 2018 - 2 PM: Valentino S.p.A v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 2:05 pm
Rptr. 352 (1979), in which the nephew of silent film star Rudolph Valentino sued over his uncle’s depiction in the TV movie The Legend of Valentino (1975) (starring Franco Nero as Valentino). [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 10:45 am
The appellate court recalled in fact the 1979 decision of the California Supreme Court in Guglielmi, a case concerning a TV programme that was a ‘fictionalized version’ of Rudolph Valentino’s life (Valentino had died years earlier). [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 7:58 pm
Valentino v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 10:45 am
See also Lisa di Valentino’s comments on the fair dealing issues. [read post]
5 May 2017, 1:45 pm
Brianna Valentino. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 7:26 am
Painter, 65 N.J. 196, 214 (1974; Valentino v. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 2:00 pm
Franke, Opinion of Justice Katherine Franke in Obergefell v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 6:17 am
Sarver v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 4:30 am
Conclusion The potential impact of any judgment of the CJEU on the exportability of these benefits, and its interpretation by the Supreme Court remains to be seen, but it is another case raising the pertinent issue of free movement and social security in Europe (see the recent CJEU judgment in Jobcenter Berlin Neukölln v Nazifa, Sonita, Valentina and Valentino Alimanovic (C-67/14). [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 12:27 pm
Martinez was personally appointed by the district's current superintendent, Luis Valentino, without submitting a resume, though Valentino denies knowledge of the allegations. [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:11 am
Devenpeck v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 2:05 pm
Valentino, 309 N. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 6:36 am
Do these documents fully account for the SCC’s important ruling in the ESAC v. [read post]
