Search for: "Value Line Fund v. Marcus"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2023, 11:00 am
While the readers may remember that in InterDigital v Lenovo [2023] EWHC 539 (Pat) Mellor J adopted an exclusionary approach with comparables, disregarding most and eventually relied on a single prior licence LG 2017 to derive all the rates in that Judgment, Marcus Smith J differed from that approach and considered that at least in this case, the comparables only have value if an inclusive approach is taken. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 11:17 am
Florida Department of Environmental Protection (08-1151) Argued: Dec. 2, 2009 Issue: Whether the state’s legislation to restore storm-eroded beaches along the ocean or lakeshores, modifying the private property boundary line, constitutes a judicial taking or violates the due process clause Free Enterprise Fund and Beckstead and Watts, LLP v. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:30 am
Five Significant Developments in 2015 The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals Chips Away at Article III Standing as a First Line of Defense Immediately after the Supreme Court issued its decision in Clapper v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 9:30 am
Benham’s article Proportionality, Pretrial Confidentiality, and Discovery Sharing is cited in the following article: Richard Marcus, Revolution v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am
A typical assessment limitation might, by way of example, cap increases in assessed value at 4 percent per year. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am
Dear Friends:Just wanted to tell you about this case that was recently decided against Aurora Loan Services. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 8:43 am
The bill would ban all mergers and acquisitions for companies with over $100 billion in values, the release stated. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 12:05 pm
Lawfare’s Benjamin Wittes will join Brookings Visiting Fellow and journalist Ruth Marcus to discuss her new book, “Supreme Ambition: Brett Kavanaugh and the Conservative Takeover. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 6:59 am
Department of Justice and a contingent of state attorneys general challenged AmEx’s anti-steering rules in a case that reached the Supreme Court in 2018 as Ohio v. [read post]
