Search for: "Van Order v. State" Results 181 - 200 of 1,396
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2022, 4:42 am by Emma Snell
State Department spokesperson Ned Price said yesterday. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 5:56 am by Justin Cole
[Editor’s note: Readers may be interested in Beth Van Schaack’s article, “Title 18’s Blind Spot: Superior Responsibility,” June 3, 2014] 3. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 9:39 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
  First up is the IPKat's Belgian friends in the form of Philippe Campolini, Gwennaëlle Kusters, Louis Bidaine and Vince Van der Wangen from Belgian firm, Stibbe. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
” The Court reiterated Van Buren’s concern that a wide interpretation of CFAA would make it a “sweeping internet-policing mandate”.Sidis v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm by Kyle Hulehan
Notably, Romer and Romer’s study was completed with U.S. federal income tax data, not state level data. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 5:39 am by Jack Goldsmith
[Jack Goldsmith and I will have an article out about the Dormant Commerce Clause, geolocation, and state regulations of Internet transactions in the Texas Law Review early next year, and I'm serializing it here. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 12:57 pm by Craig R. Tractenberg
” Goldwyn’s truism regarding contract law is remembered in the case of Van Bortel v. [read post]
  The Executive Order endorsed this approach, noting that “this order reaffirms that the United States retains the authority to challenge transactions whose previous consummation was in violation of the [antitrust laws]. [read post]
President Biden will soon sign into law the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), which provides $750 billion in funding and major federal policy changes impacting the U.S. energy, environment, healthcare and tax sectors. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 1:26 am by Frank Cranmer
The two communities have now taken the matter to the ECtHR, and in a communicated case, Executief van de Moslims van België and Others v Belgium – 16760/22, they argue that the decrees adopted in 2017 and 2018 are an unjustified and discriminatory interference with their freedom of religion under Article 9 ECHR. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 3:13 pm
The Supreme Court granted certiorari, vacated the panel’s judgment, and remanded for further consideration in light of Van Buren v. [read post]