Search for: "Van Order v. State" Results 221 - 240 of 1,578
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Following the landmark ruling by the Supreme Court in Unwired Planet v Huawei, which stated that English courts can decide FRAND terms on a worldwide basis, English courts have become a popular forum for litigating SEP related disputes and it seems that they will likely continue to be so. [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 10:19 am by Giles Peaker
There are no great issues of law on this application for a Rent Repayment order for an unlicensed HMO (though it was decided before Rakusen v Jepson in the Court of Appeal, which might have made a small difference), but it is entertaining not only for the attempted subterfuge but the approach of the property owner, Ms Cabo: Ms Cabo stated during the hearing that she did not want to know about property law, however we do not consider that this constitutes a reasonable… [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 7:00 am by Chijioke Okorie
On appeal, the Supreme Court of Appeal upheld the judgment of the lower court and dismissed the appeal holding that the patent did not disclose any advance in radar technology and was lacked inventive step.In April, a High Court in Gauteng, South Africa discharged an Anton Piller order earlier obtained by the applicant in Hudaco Trading (Pty) Ltd v Apex Superior Quality Parts (Pty) Ltd and others. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 6:16 am by Chijioke Okorie
While the High Court found Morison liable for trademark infringement as well as passing-off, the trial judge did not make a finding of copyright infringement, stating that as the designer of the device was not called to testify, copyright ownership was not sufficiently proven. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
In some courts, lawyers must also identify their year of call, as this is how speaking order is determined. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
(Those procedures were just declared unconstitutional in a parallel state court case, Van Stean v. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 1:06 pm by Marc Antonetti and Scott McIntyre
Indeed, on Nov. 23, 2021, one Mississippi federal district court denied relief, on the particular facts of that case, to a number of Mississippi State University employees who challenged the federal contractor vaccine mandate in Hollis v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 7:25 am by Robert S. Gilmore
Van Tatenhove of the Eastern District of Kentucky granted a preliminary injunction preventing the COVID-19 vaccine mandate for federal contractors from taking effect in the three states, which had challenged the mandate earlier this month in Commonwealth of Kentucky et al. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 6:29 pm
Because orders embedded in computer programs command how reality ought to be, algorithms are normative and constitute algorithmic law. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
They state it is “unacceptable to violate fundamental human and consumer rights in an attempt at serving more relevant ads. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 9:03 pm by Laura Welborn
” In a working paper, Steven Salop, professor at the Georgetown University Law Center, and several coauthors discussed the impacts of Ohio v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 3:20 am by Xandra Kramer
  Other articles   L.M. van Bochove, De voorzienbaarheid herzien? [read post]