Search for: "Van Order v. State"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,404
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2022, 5:31 pm
Canada 2002 SCC 75 at para. 40 …” They also referred to Van de Perre v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 8:25 am
It is hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 11:15 am
It is hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 5:28 pm
It is hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 1:09 pm
Consequently, she identifies a risk of obsolescence, when opting for a prescriptive international scheme.Tara Van Ho argues that the USA is engaged in counter-diplomacy and calls on States to continue negotiating based on the Third OEIGWG Draft. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:19 am
Sir Jonathan Faull & Prof Joseph HH Weiler, Jewish Chronicle: EU judges have ‘koshered a pig’ in order to allow shechita ban: on the judgment in Centraal Israëlitisch Consistorie van België and Others [2020] EUECJ C-336/19. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
…The Crown appealed the stay order, arguing that, on the authority of this Court’s decision in R. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:07 pm
Matter of DCH Auto v Town of Mamaroneck 2022 NY Slip Op 03929 Decided on June 16, 2022 Court of Appeals Wilson Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:07 pm
Matter of DCH Auto v Town of Mamaroneck 2022 NY Slip Op 03929 Decided on June 16, 2022 Court of Appeals Wilson Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 11:20 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has granted Apple an extension until July 15 for its final brief, which in formal terms is only supposed to reinforce Apple's appeal of Epic's consolation prize from the district court (an injunction under California Unfair Competition Law) but which Apple will try to use in order to make some final points even on the more important issues in the case.There are two reasons for which Epic lost (apart from the… [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:43 pm
NSA in 2008, and our original case, Hepting v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 3:36 am
Ukraine will soon launch a data collection system — a “Book of Executioners” — on Russian forces determined to have committed or ordered war crimes, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said in his nightly address. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm
Deshaney v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 2:44 am
In this regard, the UK Supreme Court’s recent landmark decisions in Vedanta v Lungowe and Okpabi v Shell have granted jurisdiction and allowed such claims to proceed on the merits in the English courts. [read post]
29 May 2022, 4:05 pm
Important factors in the decision was the potential risk to health and safety caused by protestors committing the acts set out in the order [34, 40-42]. [read post]
20 May 2022, 9:30 am
In order to shed light on the global view of the issue of genocide designation in Ukraine, we have gathered all relevant public statements by State leaders or officials, dating from the Russian invasion on Feb. 24, 2022 to the present (readers are invited to submit any that we may have missed here). [read post]
19 May 2022, 2:32 pm
Related Cases: Van Buren v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 6:59 am
For example, State Auditors found that 112 licensed hospice agencies were listed as located at a single building address in Van Nuys. [read post]
11 May 2022, 8:40 am
§ 1030), particularly as interpreted in Van Buren v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 2:25 pm
Van Hunnik (2015): In this case, the district court found that state welfare officials had repeatedly violated the Indian Child Welfare Act and the Due Process Clause, resulting in the unlawful removal of 823 American Indian children from their families, and ordered systemic changes. [read post]
