Search for: "Van Order v. State" Results 261 - 280 of 1,396
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2021, 6:16 am by Chijioke Okorie
While the High Court found Morison liable for trademark infringement as well as passing-off, the trial judge did not make a finding of copyright infringement, stating that as the designer of the device was not called to testify, copyright ownership was not sufficiently proven. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
In some courts, lawyers must also identify their year of call, as this is how speaking order is determined. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
(Those procedures were just declared unconstitutional in a parallel state court case, Van Stean v. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 1:06 pm by Marc Antonetti and Scott McIntyre
Indeed, on Nov. 23, 2021, one Mississippi federal district court denied relief, on the particular facts of that case, to a number of Mississippi State University employees who challenged the federal contractor vaccine mandate in Hollis v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 7:25 am by Robert S. Gilmore
Van Tatenhove of the Eastern District of Kentucky granted a preliminary injunction preventing the COVID-19 vaccine mandate for federal contractors from taking effect in the three states, which had challenged the mandate earlier this month in Commonwealth of Kentucky et al. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 6:29 pm
Because orders embedded in computer programs command how reality ought to be, algorithms are normative and constitute algorithmic law. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
They state it is “unacceptable to violate fundamental human and consumer rights in an attempt at serving more relevant ads. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 9:03 pm by Laura Welborn
” In a working paper, Steven Salop, professor at the Georgetown University Law Center, and several coauthors discussed the impacts of Ohio v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 5:21 am by Sophie Britton (Bristows)
This is leading to conflicting orders being given by different national courts due to their differing views. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 12:41 am by Florence Plisner (Bristows)
Bernt Hugenholtz by Martin Senftleben, Joost Poort, Mireille van Eechoud, Stef van Gompel, Natalie Helberger€ 157 European SPCs Unravelled: A Practitioner’s Guide to Supplementary Protection Certificates in Europe, Second Edition by Oswin Ridderbusch, Alexa [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 4:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Giving plaintiff 'the benefit of all favorable inferences which may be drawn from [the] pleading,' this Court determines only whether the alleged facts "fit within any cognizable legal theory' (Campaign for Fiscal Equity v State of New York, 86 NY2d 307, 318 [1995], quoting Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]). [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 4:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Giving plaintiff 'the benefit of all favorable inferences which may be drawn from [the] pleading,' this Court determines only whether the alleged facts "fit within any cognizable legal theory' (Campaign for Fiscal Equity v State of New York, 86 NY2d 307, 318 [1995], quoting Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]). [read post]