Search for: "Van Order v. State" Results 301 - 320 of 1,561
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2020, 7:52 am by Anna Salvatore, Tia Sewell
Matthew Kahn analyzed the Supreme Court’s oral arguments in Van Buren v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 10:32 am by Aime Dempsey
In a case with significant ramifications for employers concerned with protecting sensitive information, and for employees accused of abusing access to computer networks, the United States Supreme Court (“SCOTUS”) heard oral argument this week in Van Buren v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 11:07 am by Matthew Kahn
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit disagreed, concluding that it was bound by its 2010 decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2020, 3:38 pm by Eugene Volokh
Van Tatenhove's granted a preliminary injunction that allowed religious schools to reopen in Kentucky; the governor's closure order, the court concluded, violated the Free Exercise Clause. [read post]
14 Nov 2020, 1:58 pm by Sandy Levinson
  After all, part of the bill of particulars, for Van Cleve and myself, is Article V itself, and its basic message of "Abandon all hope" sent to anyone bold enough to suggest the need for constitutional amendment. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 3:43 pm
Accordingly, we affirm the order denying arbitration. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 3:42 pm by Chuck Cosson
  I’ll address only the first of these in this post (sequels to follow), but for completeness the principles are: Human beings are not consistently rational actors; Consumer preferences are not always the same as consumer interests; Winning is not the most important thing; Solitude matters as much as engagement; The optimal situation is neither order nor anarchy but one allowing flow between those states. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
On 13 October 2020 there was a statement in open court in the case of Warnes v Forge before Warby J. [read post]
The behaviour of the tax authority is compared to that of a diligent and fair administration in order to assess whether the aid was granted, thus forcing Member States to adopt anti-elusive tools and carry out careful ex ante evaluations of the tax rulings proposed by multinationals. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Human Rights Watch has released a report stating that companies like Facebook, Twitter and Youtube are right to quickly remove content that could incite violence or jeopardise national security or public order, but that permanent removal with no archive access can hamper efforts for accountability and journalistic investigation. [read post]
27 Sep 2020, 6:36 pm by Dennis Crouch
A third case that I am watching is Van Buren v. [read post]
It covers all types of imports and exports of products.[2] Any national measure enacted by Member States which has the effect of hindering, directly or indirectly, actually or potentially, trade in the internal market is to be considered as having an effect equivalent to quantitative restrictions.[3] The Court of Justice of the European Union [“CJEU”] has explained that national measures subjecting the internal trade of goods to prior authorization restrict access to the market… [read post]
Therefore, the servient estate could not obstruct the natural waterway and was ordered to replace the tile. [read post]