Search for: "Van Order v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 1,490
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2017, 9:38 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
United States, 324 U.S. 229, 233(1945); see also Van Cauwenberghe v. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 1:06 pm by Marc Antonetti and Scott McIntyre
Indeed, on Nov. 23, 2021, one Mississippi federal district court denied relief, on the particular facts of that case, to a number of Mississippi State University employees who challenged the federal contractor vaccine mandate in Hollis v. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 1:00 pm by Claire Mitchell
” Just last week a federal judge in Colorado stayed the case of Nicole Van Atta v. [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 5:49 pm
The latest issue of the Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht (Vol. 78, no. 3, 2018) is out. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 1:01 pm by Emily Dorotheou, Olswang LLP
Lady Hale, giving the leading judgment, firmly stated that “the immediately striking thing about this case is how much hard work has to be done in order to find that a member of an LLP is not a worker within the meaning of section 230(3)(b) of the 1996 Act. [read post]
27 Sep 2020, 6:36 pm by Dennis Crouch
A third case that I am watching is Van Buren v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 9:00 am
Note that two weeks ago Van Valkenburg filed a document stating that she is asking the trial court that issued the restraining order to vacate it, because she believes the order has become counterproductive. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:15 pm by KC Johnson
As Yahoo’s Dan Wetzel perceptively observed, although the NCAA is the named defendant in the lawsuit, a better title would be “Paterno v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 10:31 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The court did not permit the Pappans to see the petition that had been filed against them by state officials. [read post]
28 May 2015, 3:24 pm
We find that the "non-delegable duty" exception set forth in CPLR 1602(2)(iv) does not apply to the facts of this case, and we therefore conclude that the Supreme Court erred in refusing to issue an apportionment charge (see also, Van Vlack v. [read post]