Search for: "Van Pelt v. Van Pelt"
Results 1 - 20
of 24
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2023, 1:40 pm
Hess (a third-party physician) and Nurse Case Manager Linda Van Pelt. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 7:27 am
Quoting the long-standing case, Van Pelt v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 5:22 am
Like Lucy van Pelt repeatedly thwarting Charlie Brown’s efforts to kick the football, the new DHS rule encourages asylum seekers to complete a task but consigns them to perpetual disappointment. [read post]
21 May 2018, 9:24 am
Trial readiness is critical – A Virginia deal is not always a done deal – Fairfax lawyer (Lucy van Pelt’s snatching away the football symbolizes backing out of a deal. [read post]
18 May 2018, 11:16 am
Federal Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2018.htmlAlvin Van Pelt III v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:59 am
Here are the materials in Van Pelt III v. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 5:19 pm
In 2006, Ray Pennings and Michael Van Pelt of Cardus think tank published a piece in Policy Options which stated that the previous governing party reflected an emerging Canadian polity that transcends “the current reality of Canadian diversity” that reflected “an aggressive rights-based polity that identifies with tolerance over definition. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 5:46 pm
Westlake Services Get a Job doing Patent Law Thermo Fisher Scientific Van Pelt, Yi & James Klarquist Sparkman Armstrong Teasdale Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner [read post]
3 May 2016, 4:43 am
He presented some ideas about how to think about solutions to the problem.Similarly, Lee Van Pelt showed some difficulties with Williamson (including Williamson itself) in practice.Michael Risch's talk and paper leaves off where Hayes ended, with the fall of patents. [read post]
27 May 2015, 8:36 pm
Microsoft Grantland Drutchas : Patent Suit Filings in 2014 had Reduced by 13% Get a Job doing Patent Law Design IP Daly, Crowley, Mofford & Durkee, LLP Godfrewy & Kahn Van Pelt, Yi & James, LLP Red Hat Hanley, Flight and Zimmerman, LLC [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 7:52 am
Core Wireless Licensing, S.A.R.L. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 9:59 am
Van Pelt, McConnell Fleischner Houghtaling, LLC, Denver, Colorado. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 8:34 am
Check it out in the Good Reads section.The Supreme Court itself has weighed in on golf, in the 2001 case of PGA Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 12:36 pm
”...Here, Penachio and Carr argue that the “something more” was established because Benedict and Van Pelt had been physically present in New York for a guardianship proceeding, had contacted New York residents by email and telephone, and had called upon New Yorkers to respond to their YouTube videos. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 1:59 am
In this editorial, published in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Emerging Infectious Diseases journal (January 2011), the journal's associate editor Dr. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 7:23 pm
When an appellant successfully challenges a conviction which followed a trial, the imposition of an increased sentence after a retrial is presumed to violate the Due Process Clause of the New York State Constitution, even where the retrial is before a different judge than imposed the original sentence (People v Van Pelt, 76 NY2d 156, 158 [1990]). [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 6:20 am
Grace - Yes Stender, Linda - Yes Thompson, Samuel D. - Yes Tucker, Cleopatra G. - Yes Vainieri Huttle, Valerie - Yes Van Pelt, Daniel M. - Yes Vandervalk, Charlotte - Yes Vas, Joseph - Not Voting Voss, Joan M. - Yes Wagner, Connie - Yes Watson Coleman, Bonnie - Yes Webber, Jay - Yes Wisniewski, John S. - Yes Wolfe, David W. - Yes ......... [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 9:00 pm
The case is Mitchell v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 9:00 pm
As liars go, Lucy van Pelt was a pro. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 8:32 pm
The Court held that"The threshold issue in evaluating whether a resentence is vindictive is whether the resentence is more severe than that originally imposed" (People v Cahill, 46 AD3d 1455, 1456; see generally People v Young, 94 NY2d 171, 176-177, rearg denied 94 NY2d 876; People v Van Pelt, 76 NY2d 156, 159-160), and a determinate sentence of 25 years is of course more severe than one of 20 years. [read post]
