Search for: "Vasquez v. District Court of Appeal" Results 1 - 20 of 103
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2007, 4:01 am
Nov. 21, 2007), obtaining dismissal of the state's appeal from the district court's denial of the state's motion to hold a defendant in indirect contempt of court after failing to pay restitution. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Johansing, LLC, ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Oct. 19, 2011), the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Six) reversed an order denying class certification of breach of contract and fraud claims. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 9:23 am by Viking
The court granted a writ of certiorari today in Vasquez v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 9:19 am by Phil Cave
The court granted a writ of certiorari today in Vasquez v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 8:10 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Vasquez v Acevedo, 2019 WL 3310334 (6th Circuit, 2019) the Sixth Circuit affirmed an order of the district court which denied the petition of Colombian father Edison Alberto Carvajal Vasquez (“Carvajal”) for the return of his one-year-old son, TCG, to Colombia. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 5:00 am
  The Court of Appeal held that the trial court correctly declined to infer classwide reliance under Vasquez because, again,  "the evidence indicates there were not common representations or omissions. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 12:03 pm by Bill Theis
Apparently, none of these factors affected the calculation of the guidelines.As framed by the Court, the appeal centered around the lack of support for factual findings made by the district court. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 5:35 am
Amezcua-Vasquez, No. 07-50239 (6-1-09). [read post]
27 May 2010, 9:09 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Los Angeles Gay and Lesbian Center, ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (May 26, 2010), the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division One) reversed an order denying class certification of a negligence claim against a medical clinic that gave a group of patients the wrong treatment. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 10:00 am by Zachary Spilman
Vasquez should have been convicted without considering the effects of the district court’s error on the jury that heard the case. [read post]