Search for: "Vaughn v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 418
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2015, 7:20 pm by Maureen Johnston
The petition of the day is: Vaughn v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 12:27 pm
Among the states that have considered such limitations are Maryland, New Jersey, Minnesota, Massachusetts and Virginia. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 2:17 pm by J. Ross Pepper
What could probably be called the modern seminal case on this issue was decided by the Supreme Court of Tennessee in 1980 in Vaughn v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 2:25 pm
This case involves allegations of anticompetitive behavior in the market for burial monuments in the state of Michigan. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 6:56 pm
The two FGCU coaches - former women’s volleyball head coach Jaye Flood, 51, and former women’s golf head coach Holly Vaughn, 46 - had brought their suit in federal court (Flood and Vaughn v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 3:08 am by Barbara E. Lichman, Ph.D., J.D.
Because the Federal Aviation Administration’s (“FAA’) airspace redesign projects throughout the United States have apparently negatively impacted hundreds of thousands, even millions, of people, and because we have received a number of requests for a discussion of the bases for the currently pending challenge to the FAA’s SoCal Metroplex airspace redesign project, a copy of the Opening Brief of Petitioners City of Culver City, California; Santa Monica Canyon Civic… [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 6:17 pm
California State Council of Carpenters, 459 U.S. 519, 530-35 (1983). [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:01 am by John Steele
(Slightly off topic)  In Nevada Commission on Ethics v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 7:48 am by Howard Friedman
It dismissed his claims for damages and overturning of his parole revocation.In Vaughn v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 8:24 pm
James, 784 F.2d 1077, 81 (11th Cir.'86) (a properly stated First Amendment claim by an inmate does not fail simply because the activities were conducted on behalf of others); Vaughn v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 8:51 am by gstasiewicz
We now know Justice officials falsely stated that no political appointees were involved in the Black Panther decision. [read post]