Search for: "Vaughn v. State" Results 161 - 180 of 407
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2009, 12:12 pm
. __________________________________________________________________________________________________ California Court of Appeal Holds that Home State "Permission To Sue" Procedures Are Substantive Rules After All In a case of first impression, the California Court of Appeal in Vaughn v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 7:13 am
  Vaughn did not discuss two lobbying issues which have become increasingly important for NSSTA - government benefits (Medicaid and Medicare) and state laws including: settlement transfer protection acts, state periodic payment of judgment statutes and state Medicaid rules. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:26 am by Amy Howe
District Judge Vaughn Walker striking down California’s ban on same-sex marriage, noting that although the Supreme Court later “chose to speak on gay marriage through a narrower case, ruling only that the federal government must recognize marriages solemnized under state law,” since then the lower courts “have been reading the [United States v.] [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 12:33 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCivil PracticeStanding for Relief Against HUD Not Reconsidered; 'Gratz' 'Comer' Equal Protection Analyses Inapplicable Vaughn v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) proposes to regulate social media bots, or to put it differently, to regulate a form of speech carried on through automated mechanisms [John Samples, Cato] “The State of New Jersey Wants to Subsidize News. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 6:00 am
Yesterday afternoon, an eleven-judge en banc Ninth Circuit panel heard oral argument in Dukes v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 2:33 pm
Plaintiffs in Perry v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 3:18 am
"While it does not lie within the jurisdiction of the Board to enforce a contract between parties, Vaughn Russell Candy Co. v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 6:54 pm
Both cases are before Northern District Chief Judge Vaughn Walker, who is also presiding over the much-watched Al-Haramain v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 4:00 am
Vaughn Co.Judge Zagel1:07-cv-03339             Borg Warner Inc. et al. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 9:58 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Because the State could not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the shackling did not contribute to the verdict - the standard under the US Supreme Court's ruling in Deck v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 4:38 pm by Dale Carpenter
  That injury might arise because (1) Judge Vaughn Walker held Prop 8 unconstitutional, and/or because (2) they face imminent injury if same-sex couples start to wed when Walker’s ruling is enforced. [read post]