Search for: "Vaughn v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 126
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2013, 7:08 am by umlaw
After graduating from law school in 1970, Katherine Vaughns spent more than a decade in California first with Pacific Telephone and then in the Los Angeles Office of the United States Attorney for the Central District of California. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 7:11 am by constitutional lawblogger
The well-publicized trial on the constitutionality of California’s Proposition 8 banning same-sex marriage begins today before Judge Vaughn Walker in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (court website for case here). [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 11:57 am by John A. Weber IV, ESQ.
California – “The Cell Phone Case” On June 25, 2014, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Riley v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 3:18 am by Matt Danzer
Judge Newman further challenges Jaffer, reiterating his contention that a Vaughn index is too vague to be useful and stating that this case is primarily about the OLC-DOD memo. [read post]
7 Aug 2010, 11:11 am by ireneolszewski
Schwarzenegger goes a long way toward strengthening the rights of same-sex couples in the United States. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:33 pm by Irene C. Olszewski, Esq.
Some 44 years ago, the United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in the landmark case, Loving v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:57 am by nickleydorf
Filed under: Attorney/Lawyer, Criminal Law, Evidence Tagged: forfeiture of constitutional right, Michigan Court of Appeals, People v Vaughn [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 11:08 am by Barbara E. Lichman, Ph.D., J.D.
Because the Federal Aviation Administration’s (“FAA’) airspace redesign projects throughout the United States have apparently negatively impacted hundreds of thousands, even millions, of people, and because we have received a number of requests for a discussion of the bases for the currently pending challenge to the FAA’s SoCal Metroplex airspace redesign project, a copy of the Opening Brief of Petitioners City of Culver City, California; Santa Monica Canyon… [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 8:55 am by Matt Danzer
In the lower court, Judge Colleen McMahon rejected efforts by the ACLU and Times to unearth even the existence of legal analysis supporting the targeted killing program, upholding the government’s Glomar and “no number, no list” responses in which it respectively refused to confirm or deny the existence or nonexistence of some records to the Times and declined to provide a Vaughn index enumerating other records to the ACLU under FOIA exemptions 1, 3, and 5. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 9:00 am
On that same date, the United States Supreme Court issued the landmark Windsor v. [read post]