Search for: "Vaughn v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 165
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2007, 12:19 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice Court Security Officer's File to Be Reviewed In Man's Prosecution for Assaulting Officer United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:26 am by Amy Howe
District Judge Vaughn Walker striking down California’s ban on same-sex marriage, noting that although the Supreme Court later “chose to speak on gay marriage through a narrower case, ruling only that the federal government must recognize marriages solemnized under state law,” since then the lower courts “have been reading the [United States v.] [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:52 am by Adam Wagner
A Federal court in California has struck down a ban on gay marriage in the state, marking the first step on a path to a United States Supreme Court decision on the issue. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 4:33 am
It points out that the options remaining to try to regain integrity in the system depend upon a few cases yet pending: The two categories of cases not targeted for dismissal in the United States' instant motion to dismiss are those brought against governmental entities (Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation, Inc v Bush, No C 07-0109; Center for Constitutional Rights v Bush, No C 07-1115; Guzzi v Bush, No C 06-6225; Shubert v Bush, No C 07-0693)… [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 3:18 am
"While it does not lie within the jurisdiction of the Board to enforce a contract between parties, Vaughn Russell Candy Co. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 4:00 am
United States CellularJudge Dow1:07-cv-02883             Kids Hope USA, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:52 am
  Id.at 201,108 S.Ct. at 2347 (citing United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 2:15 pm by Lorna Jaynes
If subsequently the United States Supreme Court grants review, the process may take years. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 4:52 am
It particularly refers to the practice of pursuing a case in England and Wales, in preference to other jurisdictions, such as the United States, which provide more extensive defences for those accused of making derogatory statements. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 6:33 am by Anna Christensen
In response to readers’ questions, Eugene Volokh explains at the Volokh Conspiracy why United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 2:06 pm by Jeralyn
OBAMA, President of the United States; NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY and KEITH B. [read post]