Search for: "Vazquez v. Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 20
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2021, 11:55 am by H. Scott Leviant
JAN-PRO FRANCHISING INTERNATIONAL, INC., Supreme Court Case No. [read post]
15 May 2019, 4:30 am by John Gotaskie
Jan-Pro Franchising International, is the latest front in the joint employer battle. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 5:08 am by James McQuade
Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc., and ordered that it would certify to the California Supreme Court the question of whether the worker classification test articulated in Dynamex Operations West v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 9:58 am by Kaufman Dolowich Voluck
Jan-Pro Franchising International Inc., according to Katherine Catlos, a partner in Kaufman Dolowich & Voluck LLP’s San Francisco office. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 7:40 am by Shane A. Le Master and Roland M. Juarez
Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc. (2021) 10 Cal.5th 944 were previously covered in Hunton Labor & Employment perspectives. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 10:21 am by HRWatchdog
Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc. that Dynamex is retroactive because the decision did not change any “settled rule” about what test applied to the Wage Orders and doing so is not “improper or unfair” to employers. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 12:12 pm by Thomas Kaufman and Sami Hasan
Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc., and held that the ABC test did in fact apply retroactively to claims rooted in the wage orders. [read post]