Search for: "Verena von Bomhard" Results 21 - 33 of 33
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2020, 4:12 am by Verena von Bomhard
Verena von Bomhard   By judgment of 19 December 2019, T-690/18, the General Court delivered the second victory to Sony over EUIPO in the same case concerning its EUTM “VITA” and registration thereof for a number of goods in class 9 such as software and data carriers. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 1:25 am by Kluwer Patent Blog
” 2) CJEU on the Kit Kat shape and acquired distinctiveness of EU trade marks for shapes by Verena von Bomhard “On 25 July 2018, the CJEU handed down its ruling in the latest edition of the battle between Nestlé and Mondelez over the KIT KAT shape (C-84, 85, 95/17 P). [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 1:20 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
” 2) CJEU on the Kit Kat shape and acquired distinctiveness of EU trade marks for shapes by Verena von Bomhard “On 25 July 2018, the CJEU handed down its ruling in the latest edition of the battle between Nestlé and Mondelez over the KIT KAT shape (C-84, 85, 95/17 P). [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 8:26 am
Nonetheless, this interpretation of “iura novit curia” is not that popular [and perhaps not even desirable] in EU and other Member States, observes Katfriend and respected EU trade mark lawyer Verena Von Bomhard, left, (Hogan Lovells Alicante). [read post]
24 May 2020, 7:35 am by Neil Wilkof
By Neil Wilkof Photo on upper right courtesy of Verena von Bomhard. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 9:23 am by Verena von Bomhard
Verena von Bomhard On 25 July 2018, the CJEU handed down its ruling in the latest edition of the battle between Nestlé and Mondelez over the KIT KAT shape (C-84, 85, 95/17 P). [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 7:38 am by Verena von Bomhard
Verena von Bomhard Spain is obtaining the questionable reputation for protecting terms that are completely descriptive in other major languages as trademarks. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 6:32 am by Florica Rus
Florica Rus and Verena von Bomhard   On 25 July 2018 (C-129/17), the CJEU decided that de-branding and rebranding of goods prior to any trade within the EEA without the trademark proprietor’s consent constituted ‘use in the course of trade’ of the originally affixed trademark and could, therefore, be prohibited by the proprietor of that mark. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 6:24 am by Verena von Bomhard
Verena von Bomhard and Stefan ZenkerBomhard IPCJEU: reimbursement of legal costs in IP infringement proceedings must not be disproportionate or even insignificant On 28 July 2016, the CJEU ruled in a case concerning the reimbursement of legal costs in a patent infringement action in Belgium (United Video Properties Inc. v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 5:22 pm
Moderating this slot, Verena von Bomhard played the part of in-house counsel to a pharma company that wanted to register the word PHARMAGIANT in Class 5 as a house mark in the European Union and Switzerland, having discovered that earlier national marks PHARMAGINT and PHARMAGANT were registered for the same class, together with the earlier Community trade mark GIANT. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 8:37 am by Verena von Bomhard
Verena von Bomhard                                                                  Is this the (only) ONE? [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 12:14 am by Kluwer Blogger
  We are very grateful to Ms Reda for sparing time in her busy schedule to do the interview, and here’s what she had to say:” Top 3 Kluwer Trademark Blog posts of the summer   1) BREXIT and Impact on EU trademarks and design rights by Verena von Bomhard “Early in the morning of the 24 June 2016 it was announced that, by a slim majority of 51.9% to 48.1% of the participating voters, the decision had been taken for the UK to leave the EU. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 12:33 am by Christine Robben
” 3) Stung by the CACTUS – the CJEU strikes twice by Verena von Bomhard “The CJEU judgment of 11 October 2017 in the CACTUS matter (C-501/15 P) surprised twofold: first, the CJ held that EUTMs from before July 2005 that covered all class headings in class 35 automatically covered “retail services for any goods”, and then, it considered the use of the cactus device alone as genuine use of the registered trademark containing both the… [read post]