Search for: "Very v. Watkins" Results 1 - 20 of 145
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2015, 9:15 am by Steve Bainbridge
Prominent UCLAW alum and Latham & Watkins parter Jim Barrall has posted a very interesting analysis of a recent Delaware decision affecting executive compensation: In Calma v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 7:31 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In fact, it tells us nothing.The case is United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 9:17 am
Kenneth Watkin (formerly, Canadian Forces) has published Fighting at the Legal Boundaries: Controlling the Use of Force in Contemporary Conflict (Oxford Univ. [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 4:30 pm by Giles Peaker
Occupation is very likely required, but not an interest in land, or even ongoing lawful occupation after the complaint. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 3:00 pm by Zachary Spilman
This makes Fosler a case with a very short lifespan. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 2:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
  This may be changing as a result of a very significant decision issued last Friday by the Second District Court of Appeal in Cole v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 1:49 am
Talking of Mr Justice Arnold, that very same judge drew the Kats' attention to a recent Patents Court for England and Wales decision of Mr Justice Floyd in Daiichi Sankyo v Comptroller of Patents in which Novartis was not allowed to join this case as a party in order to participate in its reference to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 3:14 pm
Smith & Associates (see their flashy web page here), counsel for the defendant was Jory, Peterson, Watkins, Ross & Woolman (see their equally flashy -- but very different -- web page here), and that partner hired from Jory Peterson to go to W.J. [read post]