Search for: "Victor v. State of Ohio" Results 1 - 20 of 61
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2018, 2:00 am by Paul Caron
Reuven Avi-Yonah (Michigan), Lily Batchelder (NYU), Joshua Blank (UC-Irvine), Noel Cunningham (NYU), Victor Fleischer (UC-Irvine), Ari Glogower (Ohio State), David Kamin (NYU), Mitchell Kane (NYU), Michael Knoll (Penn), Rebecca Kysar (Fordham), Leandra Lederman (Indiana), Zachary Liscow (Yale), Ruth Mason (Virginia), Susan Morse (Texas), Daniel Shaviro (NYU), Stephen Shay (Harvard), John... [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 11:39 am by MBettman
Arguing Counsel Carrie Wood, Assistant State Public Defender, Office of Ohio Public Defender, Columbus, for Appellant Tyrone Noling Victor V. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 5:07 am
The opinion is the latest in a string of Doyle violations found by the Third Circuit (United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 8:20 am
Adams from the Justice Department's Office of Pardon Attorney, and sentencing law specialist, Douglas Berman of Ohio State University. [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 6:30 pm
Ross    Southern District of Ohio at Cincinnati 08a0688n.06 Victor Deleon v. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 11:03 am by Jason Cheung
In comparison, many other nations can’t hold a single election without their military coming in and declaring the victor. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 11:03 am by Jason Cheung
In comparison, many other nations can’t hold a single election without their military coming in and declaring the victor. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 1:28 pm by Calvin Massey
  Victors of Obergefell say, that’s how. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 11:03 am by Jason Cheung
In comparison, many other nations can’t hold a single election without their military coming in and declaring the victor. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
So far, the decisions have validated the party’s state-by-state legal strategy and offered a reprieve from several Republican gerrymandering attempts before a single election could be held under the new lines. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:04 pm
For the reasons stated below, we AFFIRM. 07a0312p.06 2007/08/13 USA v. [read post]