Search for: "Victory Carriers, Inc. v. Law" Results 21 - 40 of 50
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2010, 12:50 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Sexton and Landstar Ranger, Inc. , in which U.S. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 2:08 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Jerry's Sport Center, Inc., 2010 WL 3222404 (Pa. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 5:00 am
  While the carriers have generally prevailed in the cases presented, plaintiffs recently scored a victory in the Pennsylvania Superior Court. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:20 am
And how does that ruling interact with CJEU and national courts’ earlier case law on exhaustion of digital goods? [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 4:13 am by Kevin LaCroix
  At least one policy from a major carrier provides coverage for “any other services approved by the Insurer at the Insurer’s sole discretion”[v]. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 8:55 am by Gene Killian
And now, in great news for general contractors, builders and developers, the New Jersey Supreme Court has adopted the three-step analysis in Cypress Point Condominium Association, Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 4:19 am
Quattrocchi (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) TTAB finds SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION merely descriptive of marketing services (TTABlog) Trademark holder not entitled to domain name registered years before: National Arbitration Forum decision in Arizona State Trailer Sales, Inc. d/b/a Little Dealer Little Prices RV v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 11:40 am by FDABlog HPM
Barr Labs., Inc., (In re Tamoxifen Citrate Antitrust Litig.), 466 F.3d 187 (2d Cir. 2005), compelled it to do so: “Since Tamoxifen rejected antitrust challenges to reverse payments as a matter of law, we are bound to review the Cipro court’s rulings under the standard adopted in Tamoxifen. [read post]