Search for: "Vieth v. Jubelirer"
Results 1 - 20
of 54
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2023, 7:19 am
I did not have time when I was at the Library of Congress looking at Justice Stevens’ papers to give a close read to the file in Vieth v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
The plurality that would have reversed Bandemer in the 2004 case of Vieth v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 8:40 am
[6] Vieth v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 10:04 am
" Vieth v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:41 am
They are taken from Justice Kennedy’s concurrence in Vieth v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 1:38 pm
As Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in a concurring opinion in Vieth v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:32 am
By the time of Vieth v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 4:08 am
Jubelirer). [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 10:00 pm
In Vieth v Jubelirer, 541 U.S. 267 (2004), a plurality of the U.S. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 11:00 pm
” In Vieth v. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 12:53 pm
Four justices would have taken partisan gerrymandering claims off the table back in 2004, in Vieth v. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 11:25 am
Jubelirer. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 6:25 am
The Supreme Court has thus far avoided revisiting the merits of claims based on partisan gerrymandering since Vieth v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm
Fourteen years ago, in Vieth v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 8:52 am
He was hoping, as he fervently expressed in 2004 in Vieth v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:16 pm
Near the middle of his tenure, in Vieth v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:04 am
Political Gerrymandering: Vieth v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:42 pm
Bandemer, 1986; and Vieth v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 10:43 am
And in Vieth v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 5:28 pm
Since Kennedy’s solo opinion in Vieth v. [read post]
